AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Florence Liu

MATH260 · STATSC1000 · MATH110 · MATH180 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
86.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle a and supportive, but not a light A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkTest heavyExtra creditClear study guidesCaring
  • , and genuine care.
  • , and test weight.
  • and regrading can rescue grades if you stay consistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As and A+s are common with effort and , but and test weight mean an A is not automatic.

Online and in-person both require steady work; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Content becomes manageable with , yet many rate difficulty mid-to-high and call the class challenging without math strength.

Online STAT/MATH reviews sound harder on average than some lighter in-person MATH180 notes.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

68/100

Several online and , though a few sections mark it mandatory.

as no or not provided; in-person is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and despite workload complaints from a minority.

Online has both strong yeses and ; in-person is mostly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Infinite homework attempts, , and occasional regrades help students recover.

Format shift

and regrade stories appear more in online MATH110.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of Pearson/Cengage homework, long weekly lecture videos, and .

Format shift

Online comments stress volume hardest; .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Organized notes, clear explanations, and pace and guidance.

Format shift

; online praises clarity but some feel left with .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Repeated test-heavy tags plus multi-part exams and .

Format shift

Online STATSC1000 explicitly warns the class is very test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, study guides, and exam questions pulled from class material.

Main concern

and one older MATH110 review felt tests mismatched practice.

What students said

“around two hours of homework every week for Math 180. the problems on the test.”
MATH180
“ , but it will prepare you for the exams. She also provides a study guide for the final.”
Math260

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online stats and math run through Pearson or ; and flexibility.

Main concern

and long lecture video stacks overwhelm students with other classes.

What students said

“She gives out a ton of homework, and if you aren't good at math, it can definitely be a . , so beware.”
STATSC1000
“She gives an insane amount of , and has so many lecture videos averaging about 5-6 videos a week, each 30 minutes.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often mix platform questions with written parts; study guides and extra time help, but .

Pearson testsWritten test portionStudy guidesCumulative finalExtra time sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides; homework is often harder than tests.

Study guide for finalQuestions from lecture notesCumulative final
“ guide.”
MATH180
“ and study guides.”
MATH180

Online

Online tests use Pearson plus paper/written uploads; instructions can confuse and .

Pearson platformHalf Pearson half paperWritten portionFinal on Pearson
“2 tests, half on Pearson and . .”
MATH110
“Only thing I mostly struggled in was the written part for the tests.”
STATSC1000

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the effort and stay on top of the work, you're good!”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (9 online, 6 in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“The , and she explained concepts clearly, making difficult topics much easier to understand.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“She gives an insane amount of , and has so many lecture videos averaging about 5-6 videos a week, each 30 minutes.”

⭐ Buffer

75/100

“She gives a lot of surprise opportunities so make sure to actually put in .”

👍 Recommendation

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained concepts clearly, making difficult topics much easier to understand.
  • Her and easy to understand.
  • She makes statistics easy for her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , so beware.
  • There is a lot of homework but you have infinite attempts, so it makes it easier.
  • and study guides.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She genuinely wants everyone to succeed so please put in the effort.
  • if you dont understand stuff
  • She is an amazing person and overall so sweet and caring!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across years and formats with repeated homework and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1106 reviews
MATH1805 reviews
Math2602 reviews
STATSC10002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1