AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Samantha Hernandez

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you need a and solid major grade; wait for a more experienced instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNew instructor strugglesQuiet hard-to-hear lecturesTough quizzes and labsInconsistent gradingSelf-teach required
  • , and weak explanations in Chem 40/10
  • Quizzes and midterms feel hard and sometimes ahead of covered material
  • A and may improve, but most advise against taking her for major chem

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough quizzes, midterms before content is finished, and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students say you largely teach yourself while labs and and difficult.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and lab sections.

All evidence is in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students say if chem is required for the major.

All evidence is in person; only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Repeated tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Weekly lab quizzes, multiple midterms, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Students report , and first-year-level uncertainty.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly lab quizzes, pop-quiz risk, and multiple midterms dominate student concerns.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and lecture reviews cluster around , and hard weekly quizzes.

Main concern

, and harsh or .

What students said

“She doesn't and says to use Outside sources instead of helping students.”
40
“when asked a question she js repeats it back to you and doesn't answer it”
40
“Speaks like a mouse trying to sneak around, super quiet and difficult to hear even from the front row.”
40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and midterms are described as hard, sometimes covering untaught material, with little student-friendly framing.

Weekly lab quizzesTough quizzesMultiple midtermsPop quiz riskExam errors reported

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and multiple midterms that students often felt underprepared for.

Weekly lab quizzesTough quizzesMultiple midtermsPop quizzes
“every week we have a lab quiz and she uses info that we don't know.”
40
“we took 3 midterms and barely finished/didn't finish the chapters before taking the midterms.”
40
“ so make sure you study study study”
40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“would not recommend this professor, especially if Chem is needed for your major, you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and avoid-advice. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

26/100

“She's nice, but not at teaching.”

📉 Recommendation

18/100

“ ”

🧪

30/100

“every week we have a lab quiz and she uses info that we don't know.”

🔊 Lecture Clarity

20/100

“super quiet and difficult to hear even from the front row.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she kinda grades inconsistently and the
  • she talks like she's scared of being a teacher
  • u teach urself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so make sure you study study study

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Logistics

  • syllabus is wrong
  • She takes weeks to submit grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 recent in-person reviews, but themes are detailed and highly consistent on teaching and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

406 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1