AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Velia Orefice

CISM11 · CIS15 · CISD31 · CISB15 · CISD40195 · CISD40 · CISB11 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
31.25%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid unless required; only take her if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teach RequiredDisorganizedUnclear InstructionsOutdated MaterialsTime-Consuming Labs
  • Most students say you teach yourself from the ebook with .
  • Online sections draw the harshest criticism for organization, attitude, and outdated content.
  • Grades can be passable if , but learning quality is widely doubted.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many say the content is easy and grades are reachable by grinding assignments, even when teaching is weak.

Online students stress self-teach easy work; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is not conceptually hard for most, but labs and .

Both formats ; online leans more self-paced.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Online attendance is often optional while and .

Online is more flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and comments urge students to pick another CIS professor whenever possible.

Online reviews are especially negative; a minority of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some report redo chances and vague work.

Format shift

; online focuses on volume over rigor.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Frequent labs, ebook assignments, and is easy.

Format shift

Heavy load appears in both formats, with online self-paced volume especially noted.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students repeatedly describe self-teaching, , and limited useful answers.

Format shift

Online quality is worse on average; a few in-person defenders exist.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grade is driven by many homework, labs, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignment volume.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed; a few praise patience while many cite and .

Main concern

, and heavy lab time.

What students said

“She's sweet and somewhat funny, but her instructions are AWFUL.”
CISD31
“These reviews here are hyperbolized, and I feel are super untrue.”
CIS15
“Took her last semester and she is a . There are .”
CISD40

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is largely self-paced ebook work with , and little teaching.

Main concern

Missing guidance, deleted or , and outdated materials.

What students said

“Her classes are all self-teaching and .”
CISD31
“ .”
CISB11
“She just assigned everything from the ebook, a very outdated one”
CISD40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and exams but ; and uneven.

Quiz and Exam MentionsPractical Lab FocusLittle Proctoring Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practical application but mainly criticize instruction quality.

Labs and PracticalsExam or Quiz StudyVague Assignment Grading
“ .”
CISD31
“ and sometimes straight up incorrect.”
CISD31

Online

and focus on ebook assignments and self-study.

Ebook AssignmentsSelf-Paced WorkUnclear Exam Detail
“Easy but time consuming work, copy pasting announcements.”
CISB11
“Easy to get a good grade, but she either does not know how to use her systems or she isn't a very good professor.”
CISB11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She will not assist you & you will fail if you don't study for the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (9 online, 7 in person), highlighting self-teaching, organization, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“If you are trusting this professor to teach, get ready for the quickest F of your life.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“Please beware and do not enroll in any of her courses.”

📦

20/100

“Her classes are all self-teaching and .”

⏱️ Workload Drag

28/100

“this class probably took up 70% of my time with 3-4 labs a week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She only reads from her powerpoints during lecture
  • She does not understand the stuff she teaches
  • She teaches very well. You just need to listen

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy but time consuming work
  • Easy to get a good grade, but she either does not know how to use her systems
  • she is a . There are .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • and her instructions are always changing.
  • Expect deadlines to constantly change.
  • MAKE SURE to turn on and keep your announcement and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years and formats agree on weak teaching, though a few older positives lower full confidence.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 511

Course coverage

CISD314 reviews
CIS153 reviews
CISB113 reviews
CISD402 reviews
CISM112 reviews
Show 2 more courses
CISB151 review
CISD401951 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

5

B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1