AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Parisa Mahjoor

CHEM5024283 · CHEM40 · CHEM50 · CHEM44658 · CHEM51 · CHEM10 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
28.21%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; if no other option and you already know chemistry well.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTests mismatch lecturesRude or sarcasticDisorganizedHonorlock online
  • , and unhelpful or rude demeanor.
  • Online sections add Honorlock proctoring and .
  • A small older minority found her strict but fair with if rules are followed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students report , and grades that feel sabotaged even with heavy studying.

Both online and ; online adds Honorlock stress.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Intro chem is made much harder by , and little support.

Consistent high difficulty across online and in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

for emergencies in many reports.

In-person is strictest; a few online CHEM10 .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again near 28% and dominant save-yourself messaging outweigh older positive outliers.

Recent in-person and online reviews are more negative than some pre-2019 praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, negative points, and exams unlike practice.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and expensive materials in several sections.

Format shift

and ; online has dense modules and tests.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Frequent reports of not teaching, phone use, sarcasm, and lectures that fail to prepare for tests.

Format shift

Online organization issues compound in-person teaching complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Test-heavy courses where midterms, quizzes, and ACS-style finals outweigh labs and homework.

Format shift

Both .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and lectures often described as , and zero flexibility on absences; older positive reviews exist but recent tone is strongly negative.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“PLEASE SAVE YOURSELF... taught.”
CHEM40
“for and play with her phone and whatever she had on the lecture is a lot different from the test”
CHEM50
“ if you want a pass higher than C or D.”
CHEM51

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online chem with , and Honorlock tests that flash bright light and require ID each time; students call her rude and unsupportive.

Main concern

Honorlock discomfort plus disorganization and .

What students said

“ ... there's a light that flashes VERY bright while you are testing so you are blind sometimes.”
CHEM10
“ ! Due dates & assignments would constantly change at the last minute.”
CHEM40
“Extremely rude, disrespectful, and unkind.”
CHEM40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; online adds Honorlock with bright light and ID checks.

Tests mismatch lecturesHonorlock onlineTimed hard finalsTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework, heavily weighted, and often feel unrelated to lecture.

Test heavyExams harder than HWACS final mentionedStrict timing
“ .Nothing to compare on the same level n worded very different”
CHEM50
“You study one thing she will give you a whole different question that she herself wont even teach correctly.”
CHEM40

Online

and a bright flashing light; students also report mismatched study guides.

HonorlockID scan each testBright flash during testingTests unlike worksheets
“she uses honorlock and there is a bright light that will flashh on the screen as you work... you also have to have your ”
CHEM10
“she will give you worksheets that won't look like the test.”
CHEM5024283

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“PLEASE SAVE YOURSELF. She needs to be evaluted. A lot of students struggle in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews (11 online, 28 in , and tone. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Overall Warning

22/100

“ ! She's rude, unhelpful, and spends class time on her phone.”

📝

18/100

“ what you learn.”

💻 Online Honorlock

25/100

“ ... a light that flashes VERY bright while you are testing”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach—just supervises
  • sits on her phone all class providing no help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you want a pass higher than C or D
  • This is the hardest A I've ever tried to earn

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Extremely rude, disrespectful, and unkind
  • makes you feel like an idiot and will not refrain from calling you out
  • clearly hates her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

39 reviews with strong recent negative consistency across online and older positive outliers.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 523

Course coverage

CHEM4019 reviews
CHEM5012 reviews
CHEM104 reviews
CHEM512 reviews
CHEM446581 review
Show 1 more courses
CHEM50242831 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

4

D+ 3 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 3