AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Grace Peng

MTH51 · MATH71A · MATH160 · MATH71 · MATH71B · MATH51 · MATH110 · MATH150 · MATH140 · MATH130 · MATH50 · 58 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
43.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take Grace Peng if and notes; do not expect a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavy mathNo curveNice but uneven teachingSelf-study requiredPolarizing lectures
  • some find clear lectures and ; and unprepared
  • , so one bad test hurts a lot
  • Recent online MATH110 and math140 comments

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

As exist for strong students, but and .

Online reports more easy As in MATH110; and struggle stories.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Pace, accents or soft speech, and average.

Online lower-level courses feel easier; in-person calculus-trig sequence draws more brain-burner comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because lectures and same-day classwork drive understanding.

In-person more mandatory; online frequently optional but still needs weekly keep-up.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About half the ; others praise niceness and structure.

Online ; in-person is the polarized core of the record.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and occasional Canvas grading glitches.

Format shift

Online feedback is thinner; averages fail.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

and sometimes mismatched, but not always overwhelming compared with other math classes.

Format shift

; in-person adds same-day classwork pressure.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Kind and willing, yet many students find lectures unsure, fast, or incomplete for .

Format shift

Online organization scores higher; in-person has both excellent and awful lecture reports.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams often half the grade; quizzes and .

Format shift

; but some graded-by-few-things tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clarity, pace, and test mismatch, with pockets of strong older praise.

Main concern

and homework that does not match lectures.

What students said

“ . This was probably the most difficult part of her class because her class is very test-heavy.”
MATH110
“ and often includes things that wasn't covered.”
MATH160
“ and easy to follow.”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Small online sample is mostly positive for , and passable workload.

Main concern

At least one student calls her unresponsive and , so communication can still fail.

What students said

“make sure you reach her via Canvas .”
math140
“ !!! .”
MATH110
“ email”
math140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

if the class average is low.

No curveNo notes on testsTest heavyHomework mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

High-stakes tests, often no notes or study-guide mismatch, and .

Exams 50 percentNo curveNo notesStudy guides vary
“ ”
MATH110
“ ”
MATH110
“Exams are 50% of your grade and ”
MATH160

Online

Few online comments detail proctoring; success .

Assignment deadlinesCanvas grading
“easy mathematics class to pass with an A, and also how I took her online class for credit, achieving by turning in ”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but not sure of herself when teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Just not a good teacher. Imma keep it real... shes a very anxious and nervous person making her lectures seem a ”

📝

28/100

“Exams are 50% of your grade and were below passing every time.”

👍 When It Works

70/100

“Excellent Teacher! and easy to follow.”

🌐 Online Upside

60/100

“Professor Peng made her online course easy to access and understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very hard to understand as she talks in a very low voice
  • and makes it look easier to understand
  • she cannot teach math well but she is a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her class is very test-heavy
  • she replaces the if it helps you

Theme 3

✉️ About Support

  • always happy to answer our questions in class as well as during her office hours

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

58

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show stable polarization on teaching clarity and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 59
3 out of 58
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH16010 reviews
MATH1109 reviews
MATH718 reviews
MATH1305 reviews
MATH515 reviews
Show 6 more courses
math1404 reviews
MATH71B3 reviews
MATH1502 reviews
MATH502 reviews
MATH71A1 review
MTH511 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 7

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3