AI Rate Professor

Spanish

Esther Serrano

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage a messy Spanish course and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized online courseQuiz and exam errorsTough graderLots of homeworkLow empathy
  • Course setup and and .
  • In-person students report tough grading, little empathy, and .
  • One older online review praised clear announcements and timely replies, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earned A or A+, but , and incomplete grades show an A is not free.

Online reviews show high grades with course errors; and less flexibility.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Spanish 1A content is manageable for many, but organization issues and .

Online comments cite moderate difficulty with chaotic pacing; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Online reviews say attendance was not mandatory, while and participation mattered.

Online evidence points to optional attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because of disorganization, grading issues, and low care for student needs.

One positive online review recommends her; the rest of online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags, few graded items, and feel harsh and risky.

Format shift

; online reviews focus more on error-driven point loss.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of homework, midweek surprise assignments, and .

Format shift

Online students stress scattered due dates; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students report little lecture effort, Canvas mistakes, slow or weak support, and .

Format shift

Online feedback is mixed but mostly poor; and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades , and limited graded items rather than a .

Format shift

Both formats stress assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe little empathy, tough grading, and .

Main concern

No flexibility for emergencies and weak guidance on assigned work.

What students said

“No empathy toward students and if you have an emergency”
24617
“ . Does not give proper explication toward work assigned”
24617

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but many report errors on quizzes, scattered due dates, and weak lecture presence.

Main concern

Unproofread quizzes and and response times.

What students said

“there were SEVERAL mistakes in and ”
24617
“She is a . ”
24617
“Almost all of the information a student would need was posted on canvas in her opening ”
24617

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and exams, including error-filled items, but .

Quizzes and exams with errorsCanvas-based assessmentFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and limited graded items rather than specific exam proctoring policies.

Graded by few thingsTough grader
“No empathy toward students and if you have an emergency”
24617

Online

Online students report frequent mistakes on quizzes and exams and .

Error-filled quizzes and examsCanvas-based work
“there were SEVERAL mistakes in and ”
24617
“Didn't feel like she ”
24617

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“there were SEVERAL mistakes in and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews spanning online and , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

😕 Course Organization

30/100

“She is a . ”

📝 Assessment Errors

28/100

“She never proofread anything that she uploaded”

❄️ Student Support

25/100

“No empathy toward students and if you have an emergency”

👍 Occasional Clarity

70/100

“Almost all of the information a student would need was posted on canvas in her opening ”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • She is a
  • All of
  • Didn't feel like she

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Lots of homework
  • SEVERAL mistakes in and exam

Theme 3

❤️ About Care and Support

  • No empathy toward students
  • Caring teacher and responds within 24 hours

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews across 2023-2026 with mixed formats give a usable signal, but the small sample and one strong outlier limit certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

246175 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1