AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jose Guzman

PHIL9 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Prefer him in person for a friendly easy A; avoid online Phil9 if GPA protection matters.

Best fit · Easy A HunterFormat-dependent experienceTough online paper graderExtra credit in personUnderstanding in classMood-based grading complaints
  • Online Phil9 and GPA risk.
  • In-person reviews praise easy As, jokes, late work, and for showing up.
  • Recommendation strongly .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

In person an A looks very attainable with , but as harsh and subjective.

; online reviews call it a GPA downer.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Philosophy content is called basic or easy, with .

Both formats treat content as manageable; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while in-person reviews mark it mandatory and reward showing up.

; in person it is mandatory but often rewarded with credit.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Would-take-again is about 40%, with glowing in-person endorsements and .

; online students strongly do not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

32/100

Online reviews ; in-person grading looks generous with completion credit and .

Format shift

; and student-friendly.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

There are many papers and homework, but and class credit ease the pressure.

Format shift

Online feels paper-heavy; in person feels lighter due to completion credit and EC.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

In person he is funny, caring, and clear; online students call the content redundant and the .

Format shift

Teaching reputation flips almost completely between online and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and in-class work rather than proctored exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-driven; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and easy, with for attendance and a doable A path.

Main concern

There is , but late work and class-completion credit cushion the load.

What students said

“ and getting an A is super doable.”
Phil9
“He would also give full credit for in class work as long as you completed it, or .”
Phil9

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students , and feeling stuck at B or lower after one weak response.

Main concern

Students say he skims work and grades by .

What students said

“You can turn in everything and he will grade it low as he doesn't read your text, only skims.”
Phil9
“if you do one bad response, he will dock the rest of ”
Phil9

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

There is little evidence of strict proctored exams; and is low in person with EC.

Paper-heavyExtra creditCompletion credit in personSubjective online grading

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students highlight easy assignments, late-work acceptance, and for .

Easy assignmentsExtra credit for attendanceLate work accepted
“getting an A is super doable.”
Phil9
“accepted late work. He would also give full credit for in class work as long as you completed it”
Phil9

Online

Online and low, not on webcam or lockdown exams.

So many papersSubjective gradingSkimmed submissions
“he doesn't read your text, only skims. .”
Phil9
“ based on what he personally thinks”
Phil9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You can turn in everything and he will grade it low as he doesn't read your text, only skims. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting a . Credibility rating: Medium.

🖥️

20/100

“ .”

🏫

90/100

“ and getting an A is super doable.”

❤️ In-Person Personality

85/100

“ and easy to communicate with. He would crack jokes a lot.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • getting an A is super doable.
  • you will be stuck at B level or lower depending on his mood

Theme 2

📝 About Assignments

  • So many papers
  • He did have a good workload of hw, but accepted late work.
  • gives basic ideas of philosophy, that tend to be redundant

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Guzman was very understanding.
  • Prof G was a really good professor.
  • claims my heart isnt in it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews show a sharp online-versus-in-person split, but the small sample limits confidence in either extreme alone.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

Phil95 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values