AI Rate Professor

History

Cindy Macias

HIST1 · HIST7 · HIST40 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take her if , and accept strict, slow grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHarsh essay graderPolarizing history lecturesMandatory attendance riskSlow gradingAI-grading complaints
  • some call her passionate with study guides and and slow.
  • Recent online and several in-person reviews , and unclear or shifting policies.
  • An A is possible with notes, readings, and participation, but many students report .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

High grades exist for diligent note-takers, but and many low or .

Online leans harder and more punitive; in-person still tough but has more Easy-EC success stories.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Material is standard college history with and short essays rather than pure conceptual impossibility.

and writing; and mini-essay friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple reviews say missing class or .

In-person enforcement is explicit; online attendance is less physical but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Take-again sits near 42% with a large recent wave of .

; in-person splits between must-take fans and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

scores, and little leniency reported by many students.

Format shift

Online grading complaints are fiercest; and EC workable.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of , and lecture-heavy note demands can stack quickly.

Format shift

Online reading and mini-essays feel overwhelming to several; in-person adds long lectures and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Passion and interesting lectures appear for some, but contradictions, slow grading, and .

Format shift

; online experience is largely distant and stressful.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Blend of lecture-based tests or , and participation or EC.

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussions and mini-essays; and a few tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

fans praise passion, EC, and study guides, while critics cite mandatory attendance , and harsh writing standards.

Main concern

Missed class or early assignment can tank you, and .

What students said

“She grades too hard and most of but she makes them more difficult than they need to be.”
HIST1
“One of the . Sac, she honestly made me want to switch my major lol.”
HIST1
“The .”
HIST1

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and stress even when content itself is manageable.

Main concern

Essay and and slow turnaround.

What students said

“HORRIBLE!!! Her course consists of discussions and " but holy... she grades worse than an English teacher.”
HIST1
“ and discussions.”
HIST1
“ . Lots of if you're taking other classes as well.”
HIST1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and writing assessments are conventional history-course rigor rather than open-book friendly, with study guides helping some sections.

Study guides for some examsShort essays and critical responsesLecture and reading based testsStrict writing standards

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and readings, sometimes with study guides, plus multi-page written responses that reward volume and accuracy.

Study guides for exams4 short essays commonLecture-heavy testsMemorize paragraphs for some finals
“Her study guides were so easy to translate to the .”
HIST1
“you need to write a lot of paragraph for the final and mid-term and require you to memorize it.”
HIST1

Online

Online comments focus on graded discussions and ; writing standards are strict.

Mini essaysDiscussion gradingStrict AI scrutiny
“she grades worse than an English teacher.”
HIST1
“ and discussions.”
HIST1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“HORRIBLE!!! Her course consists of discussions and " but holy... she grades worse than an English teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting polarized grading experiences and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She contradicts herself a lot. She grades too hard and most of but she makes them more difficult than they need to be.”

⚖️

22/100

“ . Lots of if you're taking other classes as well.”

⭐ Fan Perspective

70/100

“One of the . Sac, she honestly made me want to switch my major lol.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“ yet. and discussions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • extremely passionate and excited professor
  • She contradicts herself so much!!
  • Talks only about surface level topics

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to try really hard to do bad in this class

Theme 3

📝 About Workload & Policies

  • if you miss she will automatically give you a 0
  • The
  • Lots of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

24 recent reviews with rich detail and a ; volume and recency support a High credibility judgment.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 512

Course coverage

HIST120 reviews
HIST73 reviews
HIST401 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 5 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2