AI Rate Professor

Astronomy & Earth Sciences

Adrian Villalobos

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle constant originality scrutiny and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderAI Accusation HeavyOverwhelming Weekly WorkHarsh FeedbackEssay Quiz Load
  • All three reviews report frequent accusations of unoriginal or AI work and harsh grading comments.
  • Weekly load is heavy with , and short papers.
  • Students interested in astronomy left disappointed by the workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Reported grades are B or B- with , and repeated originality accusations.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

, but , and strict feedback make the course feel hard.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

, so pressure is on assignment volume rather than seat time.

All evidence is from online reviews only; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

No student recommends retaking him, and comments and accusations.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students describe low quiz scores, harsh comments, and repeated accusations of AI or unoriginal work.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Multiple and quizzes daily or five graded items every week.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students interested in Astronomy report a stressful experience driven by accusations and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Weekly discussions, essay quizzes, short papers, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is online summer or term Astronomy with , and repeated originality accusations.

Main concern

Harsh AI or unoriginal-work accusations plus five graded tasks some weeks.

What students said

“He did accuse me of submitting unoriginal work many times, I had to start citing sources in .”
21134
“This professor gives WAY too much work. and .”
21134
“He has 5 every week. 2 discussions, 2 quizzes that , and a .”
21134

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and papers with strict originality checks rather than clearly described proctored finals.

Essay QuizzesWeekly QuizzesShort PapersOriginality Scrutiny

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

and short papers, with harsh originality accusations rather than proven webcam proctoring.

Essay QuizzesShort PapersAI Accusations
“ and accuses me of using AI when in reality it's just my work.”
21134
“2 discussions, 2 quizzes that , and a .”
21134

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has 5 every week. 2 discussions, 2 quizzes that are essay prompts, and a . and accuses me of using AI when in reality it's just my work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online-only reviews with consistent , and originality accusations. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Experience

24/100

“I was so because I truly love this subject, but have not had a good experience”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

15/100

“This professor gives WAY too much work. and .”

🧾 Harsh Originality Checks

15/100

“He did accuse me of submitting unoriginal work many times, I had to start citing sources in .”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades and Feedback

  • His comments are harsh.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • WAY too much work
  • 5 every week
  • The reading and modules are fine and not too heavy. It's the .

Theme 3

🚨 About Accusations

  • accuse me of submitting unoriginal work many times
  • accuses me of using AI when in reality it's just my work
  • I had to start citing sources in .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent online reviews exist, all negative and consistent, but the small sample and missing in person evidence limit confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

211343 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values