AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sing Leung

MATH180 · MATH71 · MATH51 · MATH150 · MATH110 · MATH50 · MATH140 · MATH130 · STATS · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and cheat sheets; otherwise look for another math professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderHeavy accentStudy guides match examsLecture heavyPolarizing
  • some pass easily using identical study guides and and clarity.
  • Thick accent, fast lectures, and .
  • ; resources help self-directed students but teaching quality is widely criticized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Study guides nearly match exams and cheat sheets help, but and As.

; the two online reviews disagree on fairness.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content can be passable with his reviews, yet lectures race and confuse many who need clearer instruction.

In-person and online both report pace and accent issues; online adds mic problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

because quizzes and papers are handed out in class at the end.

Evidence is mainly in-person; one as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Roughly two in ; outcomes depend on self-study skill more than classroom teaching.

; online has one strong yes and one strong no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags are common; steps that do not match his method.

Format shift

; one online review called grading fair.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and papers vary by term, but and pop or .

Format shift

Both formats mention homework and tests; .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Positive notes on resources are outweighed by complaints about accent, speed, tangents, and dismissive answers.

Format shift

In-person majority is negative; online ranges from fair prep to fire-him frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades hinge on a few high-stakes exams, with quizzes and .

Format shift

and online comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

or leave frustrated by pace, accent, and strict grading.

Main concern

Many report , and lectures that are .

What students said

“ ”
MATH110
“My class went from 30 to 7 students.”
MATH150
“ disrespectful, doesn't let anyone know their grades”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one course and poor audio plus thick accent in another.

Main concern

Mic dropouts and hard-to-understand lectures make remote learning especially risky.

What students said

“ but he had already prepared samples like them before the actual wherein you can do practices.”
MATH50
“Online with him is absolutely terrible he has a really thick accent so I can't understand what he says.”
MATH71

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes but often mirror study guides, with cheat .

Study guides nearly identical to examsCheat sheet allowedStrict step gradingPop quizzesFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and allow a cheat sheet, with pop quizzes and strict scoring.

Exam-identical study guidesCheat sheetPop quizzesStrict grading
“the study guides he gives the day before the as the ”
MATH180
“He literally gives you an his tests and even lets you write down a cheat sheet.”
MATH110

Online

; proctoring details are not clearly proven.

Practice samples like testsTest heavy
“ but he had already prepared samples like them before the actual wherein you can do practices.”
MATH50
“ . Online with him is absolutely terrible”
MATH71

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (48 in-person, 2 online), highlighting polarizing teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Does not care to explain anything thoroughly. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

40/100

“ . My class went from 30 to 7 students.”

📝 Study Guide Advantage

70/100

“ ”

⚖️

28/100

“ if steps don't match his format”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • races through the material which makes it difficult to keep up
  • talks to the whiteboard with his back to you
  • He really breaks down the material step by step

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • study guides is the way to pass this class
  • Easy A
  • exams are 100 points and everything else is around 10

Theme 3

🗣️ About Accent and Clarity

  • strong Chinese accent which made the class lecture hard to understand
  • His accent isn't even THAT strong he's a sweet old man
  • I found it much easier to learn the material online through Jacob Clifford

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years and courses show a stable polarizing pattern with rich detail.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 511
3 out of 58
2 out of 55
1 out of 522

Course coverage

MATH7118 reviews
MATH11013 reviews
MATH506 reviews
MATH1504 reviews
MATH1303 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1802 reviews
STATS2 reviews
MATH1401 review
MATH511 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 2