AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Fiona Sung

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

With only one negative review, treat this as a and classroom climate until more data appears.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh attendance policyIrrational classroom managementPicks on studentsGrade hit for absencesLow trust climate
  • Only one review exists, so all conclusions are low-confidence.
  • Student got an A but still rated and perceived unfair treatment.
  • Missing two days reportedly dropped the grade two letters, including a day they say they .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The only student received an A and rated difficulty low, but .

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Difficulty was rated 2/5 with little comment on content hardness, so intellectual .

Only in-person evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

as a huge grade driver, with two absences causing a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Would-take-again is 0% and the only narrative is strongly negative on fairness and treatment.

Recommendation evidence is solely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Attendance-driven letter-grade crashes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

; conflict centers on attendance and classroom climate.

Format shift

Workload detail is sparse and only in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Quality 2/5 with complaints of irrational behavior and picking on students, despite an A grade outcome.

Format shift

Single in-person source only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review emphasizes , so method balance is unclear.

Format shift

No format comparison available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review alleges strict attendance grading, lack of proactive communication, and targeting of certain students.

Main concern

and the student felt the professor was irrational and unfair.

What students said

“ mine went down 2 letter grades just for missing 2 days and one of the days was bc I was kicked out without explanation.”
42211

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; grade and classroom incidents.

Attendance-weighted grade
“I had to ask for an about the issue; she was irrational and was constantly picking on certain people in the class.”
42211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ mine went down 2 letter grades just for missing 2 days and one of the days was bc I was kicked out without explanation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review (0 online, 1 in person), so themes are single-source only. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

8/100

“ mine went down 2 letter grades just for missing 2 days”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

20/100

“she was irrational and was constantly picking on certain people in the class.”

📉 Overall Experience

25/100

“I had to ask for an about the issue”

Theme 1

📅

  • mine went down 2 letter grades just for missing 2 days
  • one of the days was bc I

Theme 2

😠 About Fairness

  • she was irrational
  • constantly picking on certain people in the class
  • I had to ask for an

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2024 limits reliability; conclusions are directional red flags, not a robust professor profile.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

422111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values