AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Raymond White

MATH5051 · MATHMATH · MATH78 · MATH59 · MATH71 · ALGEBRA · MATH51A · MATH51 · MATH150 · MATH50 · STATC1000 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take him if , and can handle a strict classroom style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardNitpicky graderLots of homeworkFast lecturesPhone policy strictPolarizing personality
  • and and steps.
  • Students either praise his practice-focused help or call him rude and condescending.
  • Attendance and focus matter; missing class or using phones draws strong pushback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

As are possible with full homework effort, but .

Almost all evidence is in person; one online review was highly negative.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard college math with fast pacing and heavy practice, not beginner-light.

In-person reports dominate; online sample is too small to separate content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and missing class means falling behind quickly.

; online also listed mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About two in ; success depends on tolerance for strict style and heavy practice.

Recommendation is mixed in person; sole .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and clarity is a constant theme across years.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of online and .

Format shift

Heavy workload is consistent in person; online also tagged lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, and thorough; many say fast, scatterbrained, rude, or hard to ask questions.

Format shift

In-person is highly polarized; one online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Homework and quizzes build practice, but exams and picky written work drive the grade.

Format shift

In-person evidence is primary.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and quizzes; some pass with effort while many find grading and tone harsh.

Main concern

and frustration when students ask questions.

What students said

“Just do the homework and you'll do great on the exams.”
STATC1000
“He is an ”
MATHMATH
“ and is nit-picky with what he wants. .”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online Zoom review reports unclear handwriting, skipped classes, backtracking, and a condescending tone.

Main concern

Hard-to-read board work and weak remote delivery.

What students said

“I did not understand any of his handwriting and he also skipped class 3-4 times during a fall semester”
MATH71

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are strict and format-sensitive, with his method.

Nitpicky exam gradingPop quizzesTest heavyMust use his method

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

frequent quizzes and little partial-credit flexibility.

Nitpicky gradingPop quizzesMust show his steps
“ and is nit-picky with what he wants.”
MATH150
“MAKES YOU WRITE OUT THE .”
MATH50

Online

One Zoom review notes poor readability of work and tough .

Test heavyTough grader
“I did not understand any of his handwriting and he also skipped class 3-4 times during a fall ”
MATH71

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is an he's never seen grading like his.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (1 online, 49 in person), highlighting polarized math instruction and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“AMAZING MATH PROFESSOR! Really helps all his students understand the material.”

⚖️

28/100

“He is an ”

📚 Workload Load

24/100

“expect a lot of homework and a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he would easily get fustrated
  • walks around from desk to desk to offer help
  • he rushes through the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do the homework and you'll do great on the exams
  • and is nit-picky with what he wants

Theme 3

📱 About Classroom Rules

  • he hates phones
  • Gets really upset if you talk over him or use/hear cell phones
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a stable split between strict heavy-practice praise and harsh-personality complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 58
3 out of 510
2 out of 510
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH5030 reviews
MATHMATH6 reviews
MATH1503 reviews
MATH512 reviews
MATH712 reviews
Show 6 more courses
STATC10002 reviews
ALGEBRA1 review
MATH50511 review
MATH51A1 review
MATH591 review
MATH781 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2