AI Rate Professor

Physics

John Lee

2AG · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid if you have any alternative; only consider if you already master physics and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTest-heavy physicsSelf-study requiredTough graderHard to follow
  • Most students rate quality 1 and .
  • , and exams often mismatch taught material.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and many incomplete or low grades make an A rare without expert self-study.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Students say he makes physics harder and and heavy self-teaching demands.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

though lectures are called ineffective.

A minority of .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Roughly 20% take-again and repeated run or gap-semester warnings dominate the sample.

Two milder positive outliers still sit inside an otherwise negative in-person set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tags and comments , and exams that do not match lectures.

Format shift

, but most reviews disagree.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, lecture-heavy and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students say he cannot teach, mumbles, skips steps, goes off topic, and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; two reviews are milder but most are severe.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Test-heavy design with pop quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person physics sections are widely described as , and .

Main concern

, corrections, or for most students.

What students said

“Intelligent but doesn't translate into effective teaching, skips steps and assumes students follow easily.”
2ag
“You will have nightmares this class is scarier than the alley way behind my house.”
2ag
“Honestly just run. If .”
41365

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and often unmatched to lecture practice, with little recovery options.

Test heavyUnseen exam problemsNo curvePop quizzesNo extra credit

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams include problems students have not seen, with .

Unseen problemsNo curveTest heavyPop quizzes
“Exams will have problems you haven't seen. No: , and nothing is dropped.”
2ag
“ ”
41365
“the ”
2ag

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly just run. If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting teaching failure and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

16/100

“This guy DOESNT KNOW HOW TO TEACH.”

⚠️ Recommendation Rate

16/100

“do .”

📚

20/100

“you won't learn anything unless you teach yourself.”

🧪

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • skips steps and assumes students follow easily
  • He goes off topic, you won't learn anything unless you teach yourself
  • constantly mumbles and loses his train of thought

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expects you so know everything and NO OFFICE HOURS
  • if your an expert at physics

Theme 3

🚨 Student Warnings

  • if u have to this guy sucks
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

and specific teaching and exam details.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

413656 reviews
2ag4 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 4