AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carolyn Robinson

ENGR1C · MATHL49 · LERNLEN · LREN48 · LERN49 · ENGR24 · LERN48 · ENGR1 · MATH49 · LEARN49 · LEARN48 · ENG1C · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
54.84%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Great if you want a and ; avoid if you need flexible, clear grading on writing-heavy engineering English.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderCaring but strictVague rubrics riskGroup projectsBinder and organization rules
  • Older developmental math , and life-changing for math anxiety.
  • Recent ENG/ENGR writing sections heavily criticize vague instructions, comma-level deductions, and locked deadlines.
  • She is widely seen as kind and invested, yet .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Getting a , and no laziness; many say she docks tiny errors and will not hand out As.

Online writing courses sound especially unforgiving; but feels more coachable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Developmental math becomes understandable with her teaching, but , and and process load real.

; online and recent engineering sections feel harder through process friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Skip class and you will not pass tags, binder policies, and .

; in-person math especially polices presence and folders.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

math strugglers often rave, while writing-engineering .

; online recent ENG/ENGR reviews are much more avoid-oriented.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; students report deductions for commas, vague rubrics, and final projects that crash high averages.

Format shift

Online writing reviews are harshest; some in-person math students say she gives partial credit if process shows.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of , and multi-part writing or software projects consume serious time.

Format shift

Heavy project and deadline stress is strongest online and in ENGR; and labs.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Many credit life-changing math clarity and care; a large minority call instructions confusing, contradictory, or hostile in .

Format shift

; online engineering English execution draws more failure reports.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and heavily weighted finals or projects rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

Online ENG/ENGR lean project and assignment heavy; , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person spans beloved math LEARN courses with and confidence building, plus later engineering classes with tough finals and .

Main concern

, and final-project grade cliffs.

What students said

“Professor Robinson not only taught math basics, she taught me how to see math differently.”
LERN48
“Beware of . She grades extra hard on it for no reason.”
ENGR24
“ learning math so fun.”
LEARN49

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG/ENGR reviews skew negative on confusing instructions, strict no-late policies, and .

Main concern

and early due times.

What students said

“ . She's an incredibly kind person, but the execution of this class is just awful.”
ENGR1C
“ comma.”
ENG1C
“Ms. C is a great professor! I took her during the Fall 2020 session and I will admit, she is a little bit of a .”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes standard quizzes or tests with high-stakes projects and .

Quizzes and testsHeavy final projectsRubric-based writingPop quiz risk in math

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, math uses quizzes, binder checks, and finals; and attendance-linked work.

Quizzes and testsFinal project cliffsBinder policyPop quizzes
“Before the . The .”
ENGR24
“She likes to throw in a lecture in the last 5 minutes of class and if you don't remember it, good luck because there's probably a .”
LEARN49

Online

Online reviews focus on graded assignments and projects with harsh, vague rubrics; proctoring tools are not clearly proven in comments.

Harsh assignment gradingVague rubricsNo late workGroup projects
“Got docked 12% on a 1.5 page assignment for one improperly placed comma”
ENGR1C
“ and nothing late was accepted.”
ENGR1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a wonderful person don't get me wrong, but she is a . She gives confusing instructions, very vague, and comma.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (8 online, 42 in person), contrasting math care with . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Care and Inspiration

80/100

“CAROLYN IS GOD SENT. I CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT SHE WILL DO TO HELP STUDENTS LERN!”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

🎯 Math Teaching Strength

85/100

“ learning math so fun.”

👎 Recent Engineering Warning

25/100

“ unless this is the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so clearly and help you out a lot
  • Her way of teaching is great, but the execution is just is not there.
  • She is very clear in her lectures, she does not make you feel bad if you dont understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she will not stand for laziness and will enforce that with
  • but

Theme 3

📁 About Rules and Organization

  • She just wants to help you & teach you!
  • binder policy is also strictly enforced
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail, polarized but stable themes by course type, and strong sample size support high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 511

Course coverage

LEARN4910 reviews
LERN4910 reviews
ENGR1C6 reviews
LERN486 reviews
ENG1C5 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENGR243 reviews
ENGR12 reviews
MATH492 reviews
MATHL492 reviews
410511 review
LEARN481 review
LERNLEN1 review
LREN481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1