AI Rate Professor

English

Ivan Rios

ENG1A · 22273ENGL · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take him if you want a and can track due .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringDisorganized CanvasAccepts late workAmazing lecturesTough grader
  • Many students love his humor, care, and late-work flexibility
  • Repeated Canvas due-date and organization issues create stress
  • Grades can be solid if you stay on top of

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many As and Bs with late work accepted, but papers and .

In-person flexibility helps grades; online and deadlines.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Reading and college writing are real work, yet not described as brain-burner theory.

and papers; difficulty ratings cluster mid-high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

40/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About 60% would take again; fans cite care and growth while critics cite chaos.

In-person ENG1A leans more positive than some online and cinema sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Late work and understanding help, but he can be a .

Format shift

In-person late-work praise is common; some online call him tough with .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Reading, papers, group work, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework and papers.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Strong care and humor clash with repeated disorganization and for some.

Format shift

In-person personality shines more; online has accessibility complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essays, research papers, reading, and participation drive the .

Format shift

Both formats center writing assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG1A often praised for fun bond and late work accepted, but .

Main concern

Recycled outdated due dates and uneven organization.

What students said

“ !”
eng1a
“His canvas class was recycled from 2021”
eng1a
“The ...”
22273ENGL

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and careless communication with late final essay dates.

Main concern

Hard to reach and last-minute major deadlines.

What students said

“he didn't follow his own syllabus and .”
22273ENGL
“ .”
22273ENGL

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but messy deadline communication.

Major essaysResearch paperLate work acceptedUnclear due dates

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and papers with late submission often accepted.

PapersIn-class assignmentsLate work accepted
“he would still accept late work”
eng1a
“ ”
22273ENGL

Online

Online comments focus on final essays, delayed due dates, and .

Final essayLast-minute due datesWriting assignments
“He didn't give us a due date for due”
22273ENGL
“ and breakdowns the writing assignments and has a ”
22273ENGL

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews balancing care, disorganization, and writing workload. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Flexibility

75/100

“ and would tell me the assignments done in class and gave extra time if need be”

🗂️ Organization Issues

30/100

“His canvas class was recycled from 2021 that as to when things were due.”

🎯 Learning Payoff

70/100

“I gained profound knowledge and immensely improved my writing skills.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • one of and made the class fun
  • Amazing lectures
  • He is a and funny guy.

Theme 2

🗂️ About Organization

  • Out dated schedule uses schedule from 2021
  • Modules were never published

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

15 reviews across online and in-person from 2021-2026 with mixed but detailed recurring themes.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

eng1a8 reviews
22273ENGL7 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1