AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Charley Bell

ARTC210 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the software and thrive under .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVague InstructionsRushed LecturesGroup ProjectsUnrealistic AssignmentsPolarizing
  • Most students report and .
  • and not portfolio-ready despite real-world instructor background.
  • One strong positive review praises industry-style pace and creative warm-ups, so experiences diverge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Grades of A and B appear, but and and uneven.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students say lectures race ahead, assume prior knowledge, and .

All four reviews are in-person ARTC210.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory.

In-person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Three of four detailed reviews are negative on clarity and portfolio value; only one highly recommends.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and frustration over unclear specs suggest grading feels harsh relative to instruction quality.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of homework and fast-moving group projects create stress and limited revision time.

Format shift

In-person workload described as rushed and heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most students cite vague verbal specs, skipped demos, no posted slides, and .

Format shift

; majority disagree.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Course is project- and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ARTC210 is described as rushed and vague by most, with , and ; one student loved the industry pace.

Main concern

, and little time for feedback leave students stressed.

What students said

“the , and not realistic.”
ARTC210
“Lectures felt rushed with little instruction or demos, and students were expected to already know the material.”
ARTC210
“Vague Instructions; first 4 weeks”
ARTC210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; assessment risk comes from vague project criteria, not proctoring.

Project BasedGroup ProjectsMinimal Written Specs

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is project-based with group work; written Canvas specs and .

Group ProjectsVague SpecsPortfolio Projects
“Project specifications weren't typed up into Canvas for first 4 weeks & we just had to ”
ARTC210
“Projects weren't portfolio-worthy, assignments felt unrealistic, and .”
ARTC210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Vague Instructions; Project specifications weren't typed up into Canvas for first 4 weeks & we just had to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person ARTC210 reviews with mixed polarity. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Lectures felt rushed with little instruction or demos, and students were expected to already know the material.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“the , and not realistic.”

📦 Portfolio Value

20/100

“I could not use any of my finished work as part of my portfolio.”

⚡ Pace & Workload

32/100

“No one knew what was going on and everyone was stressed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures felt rushed with little instruction or demos
  • Lectures are zoomed through so no time for notes
  • His fun, engaging warm-ups spark creativity

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Deadlines move quickly, preparing you for real industry standards

Theme 3

🧩 About Course Structure

  • he doesn't post the slides
  • Group projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 recent in-person reviews with conflicting tones and limited historical span reduce confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ARTC2104 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1