AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Timothy Takashima

MATH71 · STATS110 · MATH110 · MAHT71 · MATH140 · MATH130 · STATS · 180 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
14.81%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you have any other option; only consider him if you already excel at stats and can absorb a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyMass Drop RatesCondescending AttitudeHeavy Homework
  • Most students report , and a demoralizing classroom climate
  • Workload is high with and
  • A small minority say office hours and hard work can pay off, but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Harsh point deductions, test-heavy grading, and .

Both formats report strict grading; nearly all detailed .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

, and exams that introduce unfamiliar or trick content make the class intellectually brutal.

; sparse online reviews agree it moves quickly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most students say missing class leaves you lost and that showing up and lectures.

; online evidence is limited.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

The dominant message is do not take , and high failure or .

; a few older reviews are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly cite picky partial-credit rules, decimal-place deductions, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

as extreme, with long daily sets plus frequent quizzes and exams.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in nearly all in-person reviews and the available online comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Many students call lectures incomplete or demeaning, though a minority say he can teach if you already know the material.

Format shift

; online reviews also report weak support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Exams and quizzes dominate the grade, often .

Format shift

and limited online reports.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections are widely called demeaning and unsupportive, with and .

Main concern

while lectures often feel fast, incomplete, or hostile to questions.

What students said

“ !!! One of the .”
MATH110
“ if u can. yet. Inconsiderate.”
STATS
“ ! More than half of the class is failing near the end of the semester.”
110

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Limited online reviews still , and little flexibility.

Main concern

and ; support is reported as weak.

What students said

“Lots of homework and exams are very difficult. can cost points.”
110
“ . .”
MATH110
“He is a very bad teacher and has no sympathy for his students.”
MAHT71

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and are graded with little forgiveness for small mistakes.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsPicky Partial CreditNo Clear Study Guide

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are repeatedly called trick-filled, extremely picky, and disconnected from class practice.

Trick QuestionsShow Work a Certain WayTest HeavyHarsh Partial Credit
“He and knocks of 2-3 points for every mistake which tanks your grade.”
110
“His quizzes and and he goes out of his way to trick you with the questions.”
MATH110

Online

Online reviews describe difficult exams and strict grading, including point loss for .

Difficult ExamsStrict GradingHomework-Exam Mismatch
“Lots of homework and exams are very difficult. can cost points.”
110
“ . .”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! One of the . He does not care about the students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Teaching Disaster

24/100

“Berating, mean, not good at teaching in general, uncompassionate, gets a kick out of making students feel incompetent when they ask questions.”

📉 Recommendation Reality

16/100

“Please make yourself a . or you'll torture yourself / waste your time.”

🧪

22/100

“The teacher. You feel a bit... tricked?”

📚 Workload Crush

18/100

“so planet.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Cannot teach for the life of him he is teaching his own version of stats at this point
  • He lectures very quickly and many times a new chapter, he only covers two problems in class
  • I got more viable lecturing from 10 minute youtube videos.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Only 3 students remained in his
  • More than half of the class is failing near the end of the semester.

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Climate

  • He brags a lot
  • He belittles you in front of the whole class & doesn't answer the question
  • He is extremely rude to students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

180

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show , and classroom climate, with detailed grade and drop evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 524
3 out of 519
2 out of 545
1 out of 567

Course coverage

MATH11019 reviews
11013 reviews
MAHT715 reviews
STATS4 reviews
STATS1104 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH1302 reviews
MATH712 reviews
MATH1401 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

9

F 9

No letter grade reported

24

Drop/Withdrawal 17 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1