AI Rate Professor

Art History

Monica Eastridge

AHIS13 · AHIS4 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Recent student experience is high-risk; if you can self-advocate and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAI Accusation RiskSubjective GradingNote-Taking HeavyPolarized ReviewsHarsh on Essays
  • Older and some summer reviews describe a
  • Recent and aggressive AI or plagiarism accusations
  • Full credit is often hard to earn because answers must match her preferred interpretation

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some older students got easy As by keeping up, but and AI flags make high grades unreliable.

Older online reviews often report easy As; recent online and in-person reviews report harsh or zeroed work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Weekly notes, quizzes, discussions, and typical survey.

Both formats require heavy note-taking; recent reviews add stress from AI accusations.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Many sections, especially as optional or not central.

Online is largely async and flexible; and exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Positive older reviews exist, but the recent volume of run-away warnings about AI accusations outweighs them.

Online is polarized by year; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

26/100

Recent students say , and AI flags can wipe out major work.

Format shift

; recent reviews in both formats call grading harsh and subjective.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Weekly , and exams.

Format shift

Workload complaints appear in both formats, especially around long notes assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Structure and communication can be strong, but trust collapses when students feel accused or dismissed.

Format shift

Online has the strongest positive teaching praise from older terms; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly notes, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online structure is notes-quiz-discussion heavy; and essay stress.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews skew more negative lately, citing , and little room for interpretation.

Main concern

Students report being accused of cheating or AI use based on weak evidence and feeling unable to appeal.

What students said

“Run... ! Uses her own AI detector and accuses you of using AI even when you have proof.”
AHIS13
“ . Subjective. Frustrating. Rarely gives out 100 % .”
AHIS4
“She is strict about note taking and grades harshly.”
AHIS13

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

earlier students loved the , while recent students report zeros from AI flags and .

Main concern

AI or plagiarism accusations and end-of-term grade changes are the biggest online risks.

What students said

“Avoid this professor at all costs. wording like "went above and beyond".”
AHIS4
“My essay got flagged 3% and she gave me a zero. .”
AHIS13
“Clearly structured class with only 3 assignments due and so you know what to do.”
AHIS4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and essay responses are common, and recent comments describe harsh AI .

Weekly QuizzesShort Essay FinalsAI Detector UseSubjective Rubrics

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and heavy quiz load, with AI or cheating suspicion raised in several cases.

Multiple Choice ExamsResponse EssaysLots of QuizzesAI Detector
“ and response essays. and ran through her own faulty AI detector (not Turnitin).”
AHIS13
“She had an issue with me finishing my midterm in 30 minutes instead of the full hour and assumed I cheated.”
AHIS13

Online

Online finals and essays are described as short responses or module-based quizzes; reviews mention .

Module QuizzesDiscussion PostsShort Essay FinalAI Accusations
“Quizzes are worth about 5% of your grade. . Will also say your using AI without proof.”
AHIS4
“You have 2 attempts on all quizzes and even the final.”
AHIS4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run... ! Uses her own AI detector and accuses you of using AI even when you have proof.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting the split between older structured praise and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚨 AI Accusation Risk

20/100

“Professor seemed determined to prove I used AI based on her feelings, not evidence.”

⚖️

26/100

“Rarely gives full credit bcuz students must go above n beyond what she asks but .”

📅 Older Easy Structure

70/100

“Keep up with the work and it will be fairly easy. 1 notes assignment, 1 discussion and 1 quiz due every week.”

📉 Recommendation Reality

34/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Clearly structured class with only 3 assignments due every week
  • It is obvious that she loves what she teaches and has a great deal of knowledge to share
  • The class felt more like a one sided therapy session than an actual course.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You won't get an A unless your answers reflect her exact views
  • She either gives grades as A's on some of your work and or F's
  • There's no room for interpretation, which makes no sense for an art class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Trust & AI

  • My essay got flagged 3% and she gave me a zero
  • Will also say your using AI without proof
  • AI claims on student work come up often in this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews are detailed, but a sharp split between older positive and recent negative experiences lowers consistency.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 514

Course coverage

AHIS415 reviews
AHIS1313 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 10 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2