AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Adelina Kaye

MATH110H · MATH51 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MATH50 · MATH100 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
75.86%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework and tests.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringAmazing lecturesAccessible outside classTest heavyLots of homework
  • and strong support outside class.
  • A is achievable with steady work though tests and .
  • A minority report unclear instructions and and tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn As with notes and homework, but some say an A is tough and .

Online and exams; in person stresses focusing in class and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is often described as clear and doable for stats and calc support, with avg difficulty around moderate.

Online calc and ; a few in-person MATH110 reviews call explanations confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and optional in others, so flexibility depends on the term.

Both formats report mixed mandatory and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and care, despite a vocal minority who prefer another professor.

Online and in person both lean recommend, with recent online MATH110 more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some report half credit and curves; and discussions.

Format shift

; in person half credit and practice finals help.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

WebAssign or , and tests add up but many say it is manageable if you stay current.

Format shift

Online often has several videos and assignments per week; in person also reports lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and accessibility, with a minority calling instructions unclear.

Format shift

Online video lectures and forum help are strong positives; in person quality is more split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and finals, with homework supporting practice.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests; and WebAssign.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are mostly glowing about kindness and unclear instructions, missed classes, and harsh tests.

Main concern

A and tests strict.

What students said

“Genuinely the goat, so fr rn bro she is such a clutch professor”
MATH180
“It wasn't the subject that was difficult, more of and communication.”
MATH110
“Exams and and straightforward as she tells us what will be tested.”
MATH110H

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly praise clear video lectures, fast help, and and exams, with some notes about weekly workload and .

Main concern

Weekly assignments and .

What students said

“Even if I was an asynchronous course, she managed to make me excited to learn Calculus.”
MATH180
“You will and exams.”
MATH110
“ ”
MATH51

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often straightforward if you prepare from notes and practice, but still a large grade share.

Test heavyPractice final similar to finalCalculator allowedSome redo chances online

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person tests are often described as straightforward or practice-like, with some saying she is way too strict on tests.

In-person testsCumulative finalTI-84 allowedTest heavy
“the , but almost the same as the .”
MATH110
“ ”
MATH110

Online

Online and exams plus discussion posts; no clear proctoring details.

Multiple attempts on examsWebAssign homeworkDiscussion posts
“You will and exams.”
MATH110
“if you got a question wrong on a ”
MATH51

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If given the chance to be in her class, do it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews spanning 2016-2026, blending online and in-person themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“One of the , and most modern Professor I have ever met.”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“If you need calc 1 take her.”

⚖️

58/100

“not a my experience!”

📚 Workload

48/100

“There is a bit of work, especially for those in the support class, but its not overwhelming.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and engaging!
  • She makes the material applicable to everyday life
  • Genuinely the goat

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's tuff to get an A but to pass alone it's very easy
  • Sit in the front and you'll get an A+!
  • She didn't show up for

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's so nice and understanding and so so sweet
  • Accessible outside class
  • she really cares if you understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

29 reviews across many years with detailed comments and mostly consistent themes of care and test weight.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11014 reviews
MATH508 reviews
MATH1803 reviews
MATH512 reviews
MATH1001 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH110H1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3