AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sain Vie Sumiati

CHLD21653 · CHILD10 · CHLD10 · 21568CHLD · CHILD1 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Skip if you want a light child-development elective; if you can handle heavy writing and strict rubrics.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLots of homeworkAPA perfectionCaring in personHeavy writing
  • Workload is writing-heavy with strict criteria, citations, and little late-work flexibility.
  • Older in-person ; many online reviews urge avoid.
  • , but A-level scores feel perfectionistic to many.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing is possible with full effort, but perfectionist scoring makes a true A costly and unreliable.

Online reviews stress half-credit scores; though some report A/A+.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content is child development, but volume of , and .

Both formats report heavy writing; online difficulty complaints are especially strong.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; only a few online sections mark it optional.

Online is mixed; in-person is mostly mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Would-take-again is low and .

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

; students cite half credit despite meeting criteria and zero late acceptance.

Format shift

comments.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Frequent discussions, research papers, projects, and .

Format shift

Both formats call out lots of homework; online piles writing word counts.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

, and accessible; others call it teach-yourself with and tough tone.

Format shift

In-person personality praise is stronger; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Papers, discussions, projects, and .

Format shift

; online emphasizes written assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and complaints of insane homework and harsh perfectionism.

Main concern

Heavy projects and .

What students said

“ . Insane amounts of ”
CHILD1
“She is such a sweetheart. Very adorable and fun.”
CHLD10
“ .”
CHLD10
“She is a ; .”
CHILD10

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections emphasize harsh grading, long writing, APA/citations, and no-late policies, with few enthusiastic recommends.

Main concern

Perfectionist scoring that undervalues effort and piles research writing.

What students said

“does ”
CHILD1
“10/10 would NOT recommend this professor.”
CHILD10
“Each assignment was over 400 words and she wanted citations for everything.”
CHLD10
“Overall, as long as you do the work you will pass.”
CHILD1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and limited exams, while overall risk still comes from strict writing grades.

Take-home quizzesOne final (sometimes open book)Essay/project heavyAPA citations required

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes open-book finals plus projects.

Take-home quizzesOne finalOpen book final (reported)Projects
“ , and there is .”
CHLD10
“ .”
CHLD10
“let us use .”
21568CHLD

Online

and instead stress written work scoring; no clear webcam/Lockdown proof.

Writing-heavy assessmentStrict rubricsNo late work
“does ”
CHILD1
“Expect !”
CHLD21653

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! No matter how hard working of a student you are, it won't matter to her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (8 online, 8 in person), highlighting strict writing standards and format split. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉

26/100

“she would give me scores such as 20/40, or 5/10.”

📚 Heavy writing load

22/100

“This .”

❤️ Caring side

78/100

“ and undertanding.”

🚫 Recommendation split

34/100

“10/10 would NOT recommend this professor.”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload & Writing

  • Insane amounts of homework
  • Each assignment was over 400 words
  • Expect

Theme 2

⚖️

  • does

Theme 3

💗 About Character

  • She is such a sweetheart
  • very caring and sweet

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed reviews split evenly by format show a clear strict-workload pattern but .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHILD16 reviews
CHLD105 reviews
CHILD103 reviews
21568CHLD1 review
CHLD216531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

4

B 4

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1