AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Laura Wohlgezogen

MATH110H · STATS110 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MATH140 · 110H · 76 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
55.26%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can invest serious weekly hours and use office hours early; skip if you need a low-stress or easy-A math class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing stats teacherLots of homeworkTough on projectsCaring when it clicksCanvas message heavy
  • Students split hard between loving her structure and support versus calling her nitpicky and overwhelming
  • Workload is heavy with , and
  • Online sections draw the strongest complaints about messaging and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

As and high grades happen, but , and frequent drops rather than free As.

Online students more often call an A unrealistic; and review sheets.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Statistics and calculus content plus long weekly work make the classes intellectually and time-demanding.

Both formats call the subject hard; online intensity complaints are louder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

mandatory and others optional or online-asynchronous.

In person more often mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Roughly half love her support and structure while and .

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Frequent tough-grader comments on projects and and second submissions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Daily or , and exam prep create a high time load.

Format shift

Online and accelerated terms draw the heaviest workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

and caring support impress many, but others call lectures rushed, unhelpful, or demotivating.

Format shift

In person averages higher on support; online averages lower on communication tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple exams and a counting heavily.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams and multi-part projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students more often praise clear structure, study guides, and care, but and .

Main concern

Exams can feel timed or worded differently from practice, and .

What students said

“She gives study guides that are almost the same as the test.”
MATH180
“ !!!”
STATS110
“ .”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

organized video lectures and early project feedback help some, while , and constant Canvas messages.

Main concern

, and frequent instructor messaging overwhelm many busy students.

What students said

“DO NOT BOTHER TAKING HER SHE IS ANNOYING, SHE WILL ”
MATH110
“ ! Provides recorded lectures!”
MATH110
“The 3 exams + final are 85%.”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high stakes and often timed or picky, though some sections allow notecards and close study guides.

Timed multi-part examsExam-heavy grade weightStudy guides sometimes matchNotecard allowed on some exams

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but sometimes paired with near-identical study guides or limited notecard use.

Study guides close to testsNotecard on some examsMultiple exams plus final
“ if you pay attention, and . She gives study guides that are almost the same as the test.”
MATH180
“She lets you use a flashcard on Exam 2 and 3, not exam 1 but !”
MATH110

Online

Online students report , and as picky with little recovery if one part goes badly.

Timed exam portionsSoftware or written exam partsHeavy exam weightPicky grading
“Exams are divided into 3 portions (TIMED 45 mins each).”
MATH140
“ and her exams are different than study guides.”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not recommend to anyone to take this course! She is a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning Online and In person sections. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“She is an amazing professor. if you pay attention, and .”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Load

24/100

“Expect to spend 30-40 hours MINIMUM watching lectures and filling out the notes required.”

⚖️

32/100

“She grades the ”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She was always ready to help and !!!
  • always so supportive
  • GO TO OFFICE HOURS, this helped so much!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if !
  • exams scores are 70+% of
  • Projects were difficult (3 in total). very stressful.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • bombarded with canvas messages
  • SHE WILL
  • emails you back instantly if you have any question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

76

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 recent and older reviews across formats with rich detail and a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 526

Course coverage

MATH11026 reviews
MATH110H12 reviews
MATH1405 reviews
MATH1803 reviews
110H2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
STATS1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 4 · A 11

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

16

Drop/Withdrawal 13 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1