AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Cara Tan

PYSC3 · PSYC14H · PSYC9 · PSYCH3 · PSYC14 · PSYC3 · PSY3 · PSC3 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
67.27%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle heavy writing and cite carefully; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing ExperienceLate GradingHeavy Research LoadCaring & AccessiblePlagiarism Strict
  • Older and , and strong learning in research methods.
  • Recent PSYC14 reviews attack late grading and aggressive plagiarism accusations.
  • Workload is high with , and weekly quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

As are common when all work is done, but , and strict citation standards require real effort.

Both formats say do the work for a solid grade; recent in-person PSYC14 feels harsher.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Research methods and development content plus dense reading make the class intellectually demanding.

Online and and research reports heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Many sections allow optional or , while .

; in-person mixed mandatory versus optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Strong historical praise for care and clarity clashes with and plagiarism reviews.

Online has both gem and run-away reviews; recent in-person PSYC14 is sharply negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and plagiarism-threat reports outweigh extra-credit and flexible moments.

Format shift

Plagiarism and and recent in-person PSYC14.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly quizzes, annotations, labs, research reports, and group projects stack up quickly.

Format shift

Workload intensity is high in both formats, especially PSYC3 research methods.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Many praise caring lectures and accessibility, but others call teaching messy, slow to grade, or unprofessional.

Format shift

Online pandemic support often strong; recent in-person PSYC14 teaching ratings tank.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and multi-exam structures.

Format shift

Both formats blend writing-heavy work with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students split between engaging lectures with fair structure and .

Main concern

and plagiarism flags on common terms leave little room to improve.

What students said

“A ! She just finished grading discussion 3, and we're on discussion 9&10.”
PSYC14
“Professor Tan is super nice and easy going! This class has a lottt of research but she makes it fun in a way.”
PSYC14

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online PSYC3 and PSYC14 can work well with structured modules and support, but , and plagiarism threats.

Main concern

, and citation strictness frustrate some online students.

What students said

“Professor Tan is one of the while.”
PSYC3
“Please pick a different teacher. She yells plagiarism at any little thing.”
PSYC14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, sometimes with notes or open book and one dropped score.

Weekly quizzesMultiple examsOpen-book or notes sometimesDropped exam or optional finalEssay or short-answer components

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, dropped exams, and tough but class-covered tests.

One-page notesDrop one examEssay exams
“She let us have 1 page of notes for and the .”
PSYC14
“The , but its open book and you can ace the .”
PSYC3

Online

Online reviews describe hard quizzes, timed short answers, and ; open-book is not consistently proven.

Hard quizzesTimed short answersTest heavy
“ .”
PSYCH3
“hard & sway entire grade.”
PSYCH3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Tan is a GEM! ... and is willing to help in any way she can! Very fun class but you have to work for your A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

58/100

“She's a chill teacher but . She jumps from various topics and .”

⏱️

32/100

“We're about to finish in one week, but she just finished grading week 3.”

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“She answered emails so fast and met with me even late at night.”

📚 Workload Load

28/100

“Get ready to put in the work to receive your grade.”

Theme 1

⚠️

  • and my grade suffered significantly
  • She yells plagiarism at any little thing
  • She is a

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Care

  • Her lectures were so fun and engaging
  • one of the nicest teachers Ive had at Mt Sac
  • always available if I need help

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • Research methods can be challenging
  • Lots of , just turn it in
  • if you just do the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across years show a negative cluster.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 513

Course coverage

PSYC1420 reviews
PSYC320 reviews
PSYCH33 reviews
PSY32 reviews
PYSC32 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PSC31 review
PSYC14H1 review
PSYC91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 1 · A 22 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 1