AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sheila Mateo

CHLD64 · CHILD10 · CHILD5 · CHILDDEV10 · CHILD64 · CHILD50 · CHILD11 · CHLD5 · CHLD84 · CHLD10 · CHLD11 · CHILD1 · CHLD1 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
72.22%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can; online only if , and accept heavier reading and grading nitpicks.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and inspirationalClear when organizedUnclear online instructionsWork for your ALots of papers and reading
  • In-person students overwhelmingly praise her as one of Mt.
  • Recent online sections draw repeated complaints , and
  • As are common if you do the work, ask questions early, and stay on top of readings and papers

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn As, but comments stress you must complete work, participate, and ask questions rather than coast.

Online students more often call her a ; in-person students say the A is attainable with steady work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Child and study guides, though reading and papers add load.

Both formats describe moderate intellectual difficulty; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory and warn that skipping lectures or participation hurts you.

In-person reviews emphasize showing up; online sections .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Strong historical praise and recent online reviews.

In-person recommendation is much stronger than online recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some call criteria clear and fair; .

Format shift

Tough-grader complaints cluster online; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and group work rather than a featherlight load.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework and papers; online adds Launchpad-style busywork for some courses.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Majority describe caring, clear, inspirational teaching, with a meaningful minority citing disorganization and weak online communication.

Format shift

online sections.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grades mix , and finals rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Online mentions midterm plus final plus weekly work; , and exams with study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

caring, , and high recommendation for Child Development majors.

Main concern

and there are , and group projects.

What students said

“Hands down the !”
CHILD50
“Professor , and professional.”
CHILD5
“Professor Mateo is not just a professor, she is more like a partner.”
CHILD10

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

content can be open-book and doable, but many students report , and poor email response.

Main concern

Unclear assignment directions and .

What students said

“If and detailed with instructions. Run far away.”
CHILD1
“The and very easy. She seems strict, but she constantly makes typos on content and errors in grading.”
CHILD10
“If you are the type of student that her.”
CHLD64

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally manageable with study guides; one online section reported open-book untimed tests, but reviews do not prove a .

Study guidesMidterm and finalOpen-book content reported onlineUntimed week-long online tests in one section

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notes; exams track what was covered in class and lectures.

Study guidesLecture-aligned examsExtra credit sometimes available
“She provides study guides and sends out notes for every chapter for exams.”
CHILD5
“ some !”
CHILD10

Online

and final, and at least one untimed week-long test format; proctoring is not clearly proven.

Open-book contentMidterm and finalUntimed online test window
“The and very easy.”
CHILD10
“1 midterm and 1 final. . and its not timed for my class.”
CHILD50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hands down the best professor in child development field at Sac! She is very understanding and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (15 online, 35 in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🌟

78/100

“Professor , and professional. She is so passionate about what she does”

⚠️ Online Clarity Risk

35/100

“If and detailed with instructions. Run far away.”

📈 Work-for-A Reality

68/100

“She definitely makes you work for an A, but as long as you put in the work, you'll pass!”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“Professor Mateo clearly demonstrates to her students that she cares about us.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are easy to understand
  • Amazing lectures
  • She breaks it down in scenarios to help you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She definitely makes you work for an A
  • Easy A if you come to class, participate and do the work
  • The and very easy

Theme 3

💻 About Online Organization

  • Her syllabus has a ton of typos
  • and poor communication skills

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • She is a sweetheart and understands when personal situations arise
  • Very caring and thoughtful
  • one of the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews spanning 2015-2026 with consistent in-person praise and a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 548
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CHILD1015 reviews
CHILD59 reviews
CHILD507 reviews
CHILD113 reviews
CHLD103 reviews
Show 10 more courses
CHILD12 reviews
CHLD642 reviews
CHLD842 reviews
215621 review
501 review
CHILD641 review
CHILDDEV101 review
CHLD11 review
CHLD111 review
CHLD51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 3 · A 20 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1