AI Rate Professor

Biology

Monica Lee

MIRCO22 · MICR22 · MBIO22 · MICRO · MICRO22 · BIO1 · MICROBIOLOGY22 · 107 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
18.37%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid if you have another Micro option; if you can study every day and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderCondescendingTest HeavyExtra Credit AvailableLecture Heavy
  • , and often include written responses graded pickily.
  • Many students describe a rude or condescending classroom tone that hurts morale.
  • and , but an A still demands heavy daily study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some As appear with heavy daily study and , but tough grading and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Micro content is inherently hard and her lectures and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and note you will not pass if .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

and most comments urge students to pick any other Micro professor.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

; written answers must match her wording and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Pathogen charts, frequent quizzes, multiple lecture exams, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students say , and often feels condescending or unhelpful in class.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and written responses drive grades more than routine homework.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person Micro is lecture- and exam-heavy with frequent reports of , and a harsh interpersonal style, plus some .

Main concern

Condescending tone plus mind-game exams make the class feel harder than the content alone.

What students said

“If you .”
MICR22
“ .”
MICR22
“she offers a ton of to help boost your grade!”
MICR22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

that must match lecture wording and feel intentionally tricky.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsWritten ResponsesTimed FinalDrop One Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and written parts, timed finals, and picky grading on wording.

Multiple Choice Plus WrittenTrick QuestionsTimed FinalCumulative Final
“Final consisted of 100 multiple-choice q's & 50 ADDITIONAL matching.”
MICR22
“I personally didn't like that she timed the final.”
MICR22
“She requires you to write word for .”
MICRO22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you . I can't even begin to describe how this woman made me feel.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person , and rare positive notes on . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

20/100

“ if someone paid me.”

📝

30/100

“ .”

🧊 Classroom Tone

28/100

“Very condescending professor and will make you feel dumb when asking questions.”

🎁 Lifeline

55/100

“she offers a ton of to help boost your grade! she saved mine :-)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Reads off the
  • Self-learn and class
  • lectures are dull and pointless as

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is not an easy A, study!
  • so difficult and she didnt give any form of review
  • If you score 80's in /B

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • the rudest meanest professor
  • She's quite a bully if I'm being honest
  • I have never felt such malicious energy from a teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

107

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews over many years , and interpersonal tone.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 515
3 out of 511
2 out of 515
1 out of 537

Course coverage

MICR2230 reviews
MICRO228 reviews
MBIO226 reviews
MICROBIOLOGY223 reviews
BIO11 review
Show 2 more courses
MICRO1 review
MIRCO221 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 11 · A- 1

B range

19

B+ 7 · B 7 · B- 5

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2