AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Delland Bartlett

CHEM51 · CHEM40 · CHEM50 · 42665CHEM · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless he is your only option and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedTough GraderTest HeavySelf-Teach RequiredTrick Questions
  • Most students call him unprepared and .
  • Grades rest heavily on hard exams full of trick questions beyond lectures.
  • A few find him fair if you study hard; most advise avoiding if you have a choice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A and trick questions that go beyond lectures.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is treated as hard, fast, and poorly scaffolded, so .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most students report and warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

About three in ; most describe a .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and exams are described as strict with little help or curves.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of homework, lecture-heavy class, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A minority call lectures fair or solid; most , and ineffective.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and exams with little cushion from other work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chemistry sections feel chaotic, with late starts, little structure, and .

Main concern

Disorganization plus tough, test-heavy grading forces students to teach themselves.

What students said

“Extremely disorganized, trick questions about topics THAT HE HASN'T EVEN ”
CHEM40
“He lectures and expects much more than what he lectures on with trick questions in his quizzes and tests”
CHEM40
“You have to teach yourself everything”
CHEM50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

trick items and strict scoring.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsHard ExamsTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

beyond taught material, and are graded strictly.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsHard ExamsTough Grading
“trick questions about topics THAT HE HASN'T EVEN ”
CHEM40
“expects much more than what he lectures on with trick questions in his quizzes and tests”
CHEM40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely disorganized, trick questions about topics THAT HE HASN'T EVEN , and you have to study on your own if you want to learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Almost always unprepared and unorganized.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“If you want a good grade, just don't.”

📝

30/100

“To get an A in his class, you must do well on the tests and ”

⚖️

22/100

“he is not amazing but he's fair. If he is your only option, be prepared to study”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Almost always unprepared and unorganized
  • Professor was late and disorganized

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • as
  • trick questions in his quizzes and tests
  • You have to teach yourself everything

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • emailed students 40 mins before class to print out syllabus
  • and is always trying to make jokes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews from 2019-2021 are mostly consistent on disorganization and , but the sample is modest and slightly dated.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM404 reviews
42665CHEM1 review
CHEM501 review
CHEM511 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values