AI Rate Professor

Physics

Chrystin Green

PHYS4A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a demanding PHYS4A and ; otherwise pick another professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderMixed ReviewsAccessible Outside ClassHard ExamsCaring or Unhinged Split
  • and and poorly written exams.
  • Physics content is hard and .
  • Success needs steady work, calculus prep, and comfort with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

High grades require and labs; she rarely rounds borderline scores.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Mechanics is repeatedly called one of the hardest classes and builds quickly on prior material.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Every review indicates attendance is mandatory for PHYS4A.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Half the reviews are strongly positive and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and refusal to round show strict grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Homework, formal lab reports, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some call her patient and clear; others call lectures monotone, lazy, or poorly explained.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and formal lab reports dominate .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHYS4A is hard and and others finding her harsh.

Main concern

, and uneven lecture clarity.

What students said

“Only the . While the ”
PHYS4A
“ ”
PHYS4A
“ and caring of her students”
PHYS4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

class, and graded strictly with little forgiveness.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyTough GradingAnti-Cheating Desk Checks

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , and enforced with strict anti-cheating rules.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyStrict Proctoring BehaviorNo Rounding
“the ”
PHYS4A
“she stomps over, grabs his binder, and slams it on the ground”
PHYS4A
“she would still not round up my grade to a 70%”
PHYS4A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes honestly a terrible professor. Only the . While the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting a hard physics course and a strong split on teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Poor lecturer, monotone, often sighs and says " "”

⚖️

28/100

“she would still not round up my grade to a 70%”

❤️ Positive Care

70/100

“Professor Green cares about her students. She encourages students to ask questions during class.”

🎯 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Better off taking a different prof. Nice person though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Poor lecturer, monotone
  • as understandable as possible
  • always answers it patiently

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • quizs and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Tone

  • UNHINGED
  • grabs his binder, and slams it on the ground
  • Nice person though

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed in-person reviews spanning 2021-2026 show a , so the picture is informative but mixed.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHYS4A6 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values