AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Lanny Richardson

AIRC32A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want deep HVAC knowledge and , and uneven organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnows his stuffDisorganizedMandatory attendanceTough graderLecture heavy
  • Strong industry knowledge on air conditioning but delivery is uneven
  • and
  • Mixed reviews from reckless homework mistakes to respected expertise

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A with preparation, but and moderate difficulty mean you still need steady work, not a free A.

All evidence is from in-person AIRC32A reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content is practical HVAC material at moderate-to-high difficulty; slide-heavy lectures reward preparation more than pure conceptual complexity.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and expects students to arrive early and ready.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Two of , but one strong low rating and disorganization complaints keep the recommendation mixed.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tough grader tag and pure effort would suggest.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Homework supports quizzes but wrong handouts and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Deep subject knowledge and respect clash with disorganization, wrong materials, and demeaning comments.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Homework, quizzes, and pure projects.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person AIRC32A is lecture-heavy with ; students praise his subject mastery but flag disorganization, wrong homework handouts, and occasional demeaning digs.

Main concern

Disorganization and harsh interpersonal tone can waste study time and hurt morale.

What students said

“ . I spent more time on the the material he is handing out to the class.”
AIRC32A
“Lanny is a great teacher & really knows his stuff.”
AIRC32A
“You don't need to demean people trying to learn material”
AIRC32A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize homework helping quizzes and .

Homework-linked quizzesSlide-based notesParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and slide notes; no clear proctoring or open-book exam policy is described.

Homework-linked quizzesLecture slides
“HW helps the quizzes but he handed out the wrong HW three times.”
AIRC32A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lanny is a great teacher & really knows his stuff. If class starts at 5pm, be there at 4:55pm PREPARRED.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting expertise versus organization and tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🧠 Subject Expertise

70/100

“Professor Lanny knows his stuff about air conditions and air movement.”

⚠️ Organization Issues

25/100

“He's reckless and doesnt care about his job.”

📋

15/100

“If class starts at 5pm, be there at 4:55pm PREPARRED.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Heavy on slid shows but as notes.
  • Lecture heavy
  • .

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He can come off as inappropriate with his digs at students.
  • Respected
  • Accessible outside class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three mixed reviews across 2020-2026 with limited grade .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AIRC32A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2