AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Amanda Perry

PSYC23876 · PSYC1A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Solid pick for intro psych if you stay on top of and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesOnline SavvyGraded by few thingsClear grading criteriaPicky on writing
  • Most students call lectures engaging and say the class is easy to pass with consistent reading.
  • while others call her picky on grammar and unresponsive.
  • Online sections dominate feedback; and note-taking pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most students report manageable work and high grades, though picky writing .

Online reviews stress fun low-research assignments; but an .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Content is mostly basic intro psych with .

Both formats describe light intellectual load; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

, though a few online sections did not require it.

and note-taking; online evidence is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and easy pacing, tempered by communication and .

Recommendation is stronger in recent online praise than in the mixed in-person set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Many A grades appear, but tags and comments also flag tough or .

Format shift

Online notes grammar-focused pickiness; and harsh-guideline complaints.

Workload

Light

72/100

Work is mostly weekly reading, quizzes, short reactions or a handful of .

Format shift

One older online review mentions five papers; most recent comments call work light and fun.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students repeatedly praise interesting lectures, with a minority calling guidance and responsiveness poor.

Format shift

Online Savvy praise is common; and unanswered outreach.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and a final that often recycles quiz material.

Format shift

; online more often mixes papers, quizzes, and recorded lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

online book and a harsh-expectation critique with little guidance.

Main concern

Mandatory attendance, unposted lectures, and reports of .

What students said

“Lectures and videos were interesting. Her book is free online”
PSYC1A
“high expectations but does not give any sort of guideline for the expectation and then grades harshly”
PSYC1A
“The final was way easier than her quizzes. Gave us the ”
PSYC1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly praise informative lectures and interesting assignments, with a and .

Main concern

Slow responses and .

What students said

“all of and actually rather fun to complete”
PSYC1A
“Not very good with online teaching she makes ”
PSYC23876
“ and messages too slowly, even after 5-6 days”
PSYC1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments center on quizzes feeding the than heavy proctoring talk.

Quiz-based finalOptional take-home finalNo midtermRecorded lectures feed quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final easier than quizzes with a home-or-campus option.

No midtermQuiz-driven finalOptional final at home
“ . The ”
PSYC1A
“The final was way easier than her quizzes. Gave us the ”
PSYC1A

Online

Online comments emphasize quizzes from recorded lectures plus papers or weekly assignments; .

Quizzes from lecturesWeekly papersExtra credit
“her lectures are recorded and quite long but just basic knowledge, makes up 40% of quizzes”
PSYC1A
“Require 5 papers and offer useful extra credits”
PSYC1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . After that her class was fun.Lectures and videos were interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews spanning online and and response concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“great professor for teaching subjects that require proper knowledge and teaches it properly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ !”

📝 Workload Feel

72/100

“all of and actually rather fun to complete”

⚠️ Communication Risk

40/100

“ and messages too slowly, even after 5-6 days”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures and videos were interesting
  • Her lectures where always fun and interesting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Prof. Perry teaches an easily passable class
  • grades more on grammar more than the actual subject

Theme 3

📬 About Support & Logistics

  • she won't answer
  • makes
  • Her book is free online

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine fairly recent reviews with mixed quality ratings and , but limited sample and some conflicting tone.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYC1A7 reviews
PSYC238762 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values