AI Rate Professor

Law

Catherine McKee

BULS30 · LAWSECT · BUSL35 · BUSL31A31B · BUSL31 · BUSLBUSL · ADVLEGALWRITI · BUSLAW18ONLINE · BUSL18 · PLGL31A · BUSL31B · INTROPARALEGAL · BUSINESSLAW · BUSL1831B · BUSLAW · INTRO · PLGL30 · BUSL30 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want to actually learn law and will put in steady weekly work; skip if you need a low-effort A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaGet ready to readCaringTough graderGives good feedback
  • business law and paralegal courses.
  • , and responsive, but grading and .
  • do the , and use drops or when offered.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

High marks are available but , and solid test prep rather than minimal effort.

Online often needs or ; in-person stresses study and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Law content is straightforward if you prepare, but pace, volume, and exam difficulty keep it from feeling introductory.

Online compressed terms feel harder; many in-person comments call it interesting yet demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

because missing sessions makes dense law material hard to recover.

; in-person comments warn against missing class.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Across decades of reviews, most students still recommend her for knowledge, organization, and care despite toughness.

Recent online and in-person reviews are especially strong; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear rubrics and , but many call her picky or , and exams.

Format shift

; in-person more often says fair if work is thorough.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Weekly reading, quizzes, discussions, briefs, and .

Format shift

Online BUSL winter/accelerated terms feel especially packed; given.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Dominant , and genuine investment in student success.

Format shift

Online students praise organization and feedback; in-person praise passion and lecture clarity with some boring critiques.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Courses mix weekly quizzes or discussions with midterms, finals, briefs, and .

Format shift

Online leans quiz-and-discussion heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students highlight PowerPoint clarity, caring extensions, fair organization, and real learning, with a long tail of older picky-or-boring complaints.

Main concern

Strict expectations and dense material; missing class can leave you lost.

What students said

“She wants you to do good. of the three exams”
PLGL31A
“McKee is VERY picky and strict”
PLGL31A
“If you do the work and attend her class regularly and read your notes you will pass with an A”
PLGL30

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online BUSL/PLGL sections are organized with weekly quizzes, discussions, briefs, and , but and picky on posts.

Main concern

and discussions plus occasionally tricky wording or .

What students said

“Make , and be knowledgeable of key terms”
PLGL30
“ ”
BUSL18
“ ”
BUSL18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and but are usually announced clearly, with drops or softening risk.

Weekly quizzesMultiple midterms and finalCase briefsExtra credit optionsDrop lowest score

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe hard but studyable tests, multiple-choice or T/F formats, and policies that .

Hard tests if unpreparedMultiple choice / T-FDrop one exam or assignmentExtra credit on final
“ she teaches you so pay attention”
PLGL31A
“ of the three exams, and she offers 10 points on the final”
PLGL31A
“more than half the and the rest MC”
BUSL18

Online

, and sometimes on-campus testing; wording can feel tricky.

Weekly quizzes2 midterms + finalDiscussion posts graded strictlyOn-campus tests in older terms
“2 midterms and a final. ”
BUSL18
“The but consists of 50 truefalse questions”
BUSL18
“Quiz every week + 2 briefs”
BUSL18

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Took her for plgl 30 and now for plgl 31A and she's great. . She wants you to do good.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 law and paralegal reviews across online and and care themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“ and makes herself available for her students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Intensity

34/100

“ .”

⚖️

48/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • extremely knowledgeable and wants to ensure all of her students not just learn, but retain the information
  • doesn't waste anyone's time talking irrelevant stuff
  • makes class fun and lectures are interesting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class isn't the easiest, but just communicate with her and show up
  • definitely wasn't an easy A
  • She is a very picky and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and
  • one of the kindest prof. in Mt. Sac period

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with strong thematic consistency on rigor, organization, and recommendation despite some older outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 510
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUSL1817 reviews
PLGL31A7 reviews
PLGL305 reviews
BUSL303 reviews
BUSL31B2 reviews
Show 14 more courses
BUSL352 reviews
INTRO2 reviews
209011 review
ADVLEGALWRITI1 review
BULS301 review
BUSINESSLAW1 review
BUSL1831B1 review
BUSL311 review
BUSL31A31B1 review
BUSLAW1 review
BUSLAW18ONLINE1 review
BUSLBUSL1 review
INTROPARALEGAL1 review
LAWSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values