AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Muhammed Khan

ENGR181824 · ENGR842 · ENG1 · ENG40 · ENG42 · ENGR24 · ENGR42 · ENGR40 · SURV1A · ENGR140SURV1A · ENGR1824 · ENGR1 · ENGR1182442 · ENG11824 · ENGR18 · ENGINEERING1 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take Khan if you need engineering prereqs and ; skip if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeable But MumblyPolarizing EngineerTransfer AdvisorTest HeavyCaring When Engaged
  • Deep engineering knowledge and transfer advice, but teaching clarity is highly polarizing
  • Some courses feel test-heavy with
  • Take-again rate near 44% reflects split between loyal fans and frustrated students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many call it not an easy A; tests can be hard with few questions, though .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Engineering and surveying content demands math and physics, with difficulty ratings often high and fast grind in short terms.

and surveying courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and optional in others; a and you will not pass.

Only in-person data; and term.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Roughly half the ; fans love his care while others refuse after poor teaching experiences.

Polarized in-person opinions only; older reviews trend more positive than recent ENGR18 and SURV1A complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some call him an , while and harsh test weighting.

Format shift

Mixed in-person reports only.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and test-heavy structure appear frequently in negative reviews.

Format shift

Workload complaints are all in-person, strongest in ENGR18 and short-term surveying.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Knowledge and passion score high, but mumbling, unclear explanations, and .

Format shift

All in-person; recent reviews are harsher on clarity than older fan reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Tests and multiple choice, alongside homework that may or may not be checked.

Format shift

In-person only; several courses described as test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

passionate knowledge and office-hour help clash with , and uneven organization.

Main concern

Inaudible lectures, tests , and high dropout in some sections.

What students said

“He is really bad at teaching. The study guide is the questions we did in class; however, the .”
ENGR18
“He's nice and knowledgeable but he doesn't know how to teach.”
SURV1A
“Professor Khan is one of the . He really knows the material he presents, and he is so passionate about engineering.”
ENG42

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

finals with occasional cheat sheets; friendliness is mixed.

Multiple Choice FinalCheat Sheet AllowedHard MidtermsFew Questions Per Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but also multiple-choice finals with cheat sheets in some sections.

Multiple Choice FinalCheat SheetTests Unlike Study GuideFew Questions Per Exam
“you get a cheat sheet for exams and theyre multiple choice”
SURV1A
“the ”
ENGR18
“The but there are only two or three questions.”
ENGR40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's nice and knowledgeable but he doesn't know how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 in-person reviews spanning decades, balancing loyal fans against clarity and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarizing Teaching

55/100

“He is really bad at teaching.”

🧠 Deep Knowledge

78/100

“He really knows the material he presents, and he is so passionate about engineering.”

📝

40/100

“ but ”

❤️ Student Care

70/100

“Great Professor really cares for his students and is willing to help them succeed in any way!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor mumbles every word of his lecture
  • he would just do it.
  • His lecture are a little dull but he's an old-school professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Although his class isn't an easy A.
  • he gave me a B! He is the !
  • you'll have to grind but .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustrations

  • expects us to purchase a textbook published in the 1971
  • only 5 are left so you know how good his teaching is
  • Hopeless teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

37 in-person reviews across many years and courses show consistent knowledge praise and repeated clarity complaints, supporting a medium-low blended score.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGR18 reviews
ENGR185 reviews
ENGR404 reviews
SURV1A4 reviews
ENG402 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENG422 reviews
ENGR18242 reviews
ENGR422 reviews
ENG11 review
ENG118241 review
ENGINEERING11 review
ENGR11824421 review
ENGR140SURV1A1 review
ENGR1818241 review
ENGR241 review
ENGR8421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1