AI Rate Professor

English

Jill Gold Wright

ENGL1B · ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENG67 · ENGL67 · HUM1 · HUMA1 · ENG1B · ENG68 · ENGL055 · ENGLISH · ENGLISH67 · 111 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you want to become a stronger writer and will do the reading and ; skip if you need an easy A or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough but transformative graderAmazing feedback on essaysInspirational and hilarious lecturesHeavy reading and papersMandatory attendance
  • Most students say and passion sharply improve their writing.
  • Expect , and .
  • A vocal minority dislikes her attitude and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

and heavy essays mean an A usually requires strong writing effort and .

Online and in-person both stress tough grading; a if work is done.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college English with and , but workload intensity keeps it from feeling introductory.

Online winter/summer sessions feel especially reading- and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags like Skip class? You won't pass appear often.

In-person evidence is strongly mandatory; online is mixed but still often marked yes for .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

because writing skills jump when students engage, despite tough grading and a few harsh reviews.

Online recent reviews lean recommend-if-you-write-well; and a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Frequent tough-grader tags and subjective scoring without a .

Format shift

Both formats call her a ; online still praises fairness of feedback.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

So , and intersession essay every week make the load heavy.

Format shift

Online intersession reviews emphasize weekly essays; .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and feedback that improves writing.

Format shift

In-person has deeper praise and more career-defining stories; online still rates her engaging and supportive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and reading quizzes more than one big exam.

Format shift

Online leans discussion posts plus essays; and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and life-changing writing growth, with mandatory attendance and heavy paper load.

Main concern

Some report harsh attitude, no rubric favoritism, and .

What students said

“Dr. Goldwright !! She is very helpful and and thoroughly.”
ENG1A
“Although she is tough on grading, she enables students to as long as they recognize the .”
ENG1A
“Her grading also isn't the but says "I think this deserves a _" which opens the door for favoritism.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students call her tough but fair, with engaging lectures and ; strong writers who use the .

Main concern

Tough grading and campus writing-center support.

What students said

“Dr. Gold Wright is a tough but . Her lectures are engaging, and .”
ENG1A
“She's a however she is a .”
ENG1A
“Beware if you are taking this course over winter/summer; there are and A LOT of reading.”
ENGL1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and ; policy details beyond that are not clearly proven.

Reading quizzesPop quizzesEssay-heavy papersParticipation-based success

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and occasional pop quizzes; closed-book software is not clearly proven.

Pop quizzesChapter reading quizzesMultiple papersIn-class discussions
“Make sure to read the book she assigns to you since she will give out quizzes about the chapters that we had to read on our own.”
ENG1A
“if you don't do the , and .”
ENG1A

Online

, and ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Weekly essaysDiscussion postsHeavy reading
“there are and A LOT of reading.”
ENGL1B
“ so it can be difficult to know what to write about to receive full credit.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Gold Wright is inspirational and . Although she is tough on grading, she enables students to do better on future papers as long as they recognize the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

✍️ Writing Transformation

84/100

“She's one of the . My writing had improved so much after taking her class.”

📝

38/100

“she is a . so it can be difficult to know what to write about to receive full credit.”

😂 Humor and Energy

80/100

“She is also very funny and her jokes add a lot to the class.”

👍 If You Work

76/100

“I 100% recommend her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and and thoroughly.
  • , and very knowledgeable.
  • and makes it easy to understand every lesson taught.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she is a
  • So many papers
  • easy class, easy essays, and easy A !

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is very friendly, understandable and treats us like her kids
  • She is very sweet and caring with her student
  • She's a time waster who will assign you bad books

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

111

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews spanning 2011–2025 with , and writing growth support high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 582
4 out of 515
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1A13 reviews
ENG6712 reviews
ENGL676 reviews
ENGLISH675 reviews
ENG1B3 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ENG682 reviews
ENGL1B2 reviews
201861 review
206771 review
ENGL0551 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLISH1 review
HUM11 review
HUMA11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 11

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 5

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2