AI Rate Professor

Economics

Esha Ahmed

BUSC1AH · BUSC1S · BUSC1B · BUSC1A · BUS1A · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
64%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if , and lean on cheat sheets and curves, but expect mixed lecture clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCheat sheet examsWeekly light homeworkPolarizing lecturesDrops lowest scoresCurves exams
  • Many students call macro/micro an easy A with 10 MCQ weekly homework and .
  • A sizable minority report , and poor email response.
  • In-person recent sections trend warmer; some online and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Cheat , and light weekly HW make As common if you stay on top of exams.

In person feels easier with cheat sheets; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro macro/micro content is manageable for most, though a minority find concepts rushed or confusing.

Recent in-person honors and standard sections lean easier than some online or older terms.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

; others use participation or say show up for lecture depth.

Online is usually async-flexible; in person swings between optional and participation-based.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About two-thirds would take again, with strong and tests.

; online and older reviews are more split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Frequent curves, in some terms, and .

Format shift

Leniency is clearer in many in-person and some online sections; a few call her a .

Workload

Light

70/100

Typical load is about ten weekly MCQs plus two midterms and a final, though some terms feel heavier.

Format shift

Recent in-person HW is light; some online and older terms report lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many call lectures clear and caring, while .

Format shift

; online quality is more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and and occasional quizzes or discussions as support.

Format shift

; online sometimes adds discussions and timed quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In person, many students praise clear slides, optional or light attendance, weekly 10-question homework, and cheat sheets; some still find lectures boring or BUSC1B tougher.

Main concern

Micro or denser sections can feel lecture-heavy and grade-dependent on a few exams.

What students said

“Weekly homework is only 10 MCQs; you get a cheat sheet for 2 midterms and the final.”
BUSC1AH
“ ”
BUSC1AH
“We can't remember a detail from a couple months ago today.”
BUSC1B

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections range from straightforward async with and occasional disorganization or weak support.

Main concern

and , and less aligned with homework.

What students said

“super easy class no material cost, maybe 2 hours of work per week max lol”
BUSC1A
“The midterm and final are timed at 2 mins maximum per question if you want to submit on time.”
BUSC1A
“I didn't use a textbook!”
BUSC1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because many sections allow notes and provide study guides, though some online timed formats are harsher.

Cheat sheet allowedStudy guidesTimed online tests in some sectionsExam curves

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals a full page, with questions similar to homework and study guides.

One-page cheat sheetFront-page notes on midtermsFull-page notes on finalStudy guides
“you get a cheat sheet for 2 midterms and the final”
BUSC1AH
“lets you have front page of notes. Final is also 20% but she lets you have a full page.”
BUSC1B
“the study guides provided often indicate ~95% of the ”
BUSC1AH

Online

may help but timing and no-backtrack rules stress some students; study guides get mixed reviews.

Timed testsNotes sometimes allowedStudy guides mixedDrop lowest scores
“The midterm and final are timed at 2 mins maximum per question if you want to submit on time.”
BUSC1A
“Once you go to a question, you can't go back.”
BUSC1A
“ notes.”
BUSC1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if . Weekly homework is only 10 MCQs; you get a cheat sheet for 2 midterms and the final.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 mixed online and and test complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She made economics so easy to understand and it was an easy A but I walked out knowing a lot about econ 10/10.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“Not sure why her ratings are so low, super easy class no material cost”

📝

76/100

“On midterms and and the questions are similar to the homework and study guide.”

⚠️ Confusion Risk

40/100

“But the . and then forgets to connect it to the bigger picture.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Weekly homework is only 10 MCQs
  • maybe 2 hours of work per week max lol
  • This was one of the

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • you get a cheat sheet for 2 midterms and the final
  • She rounds too
  • The midterm and final are timed at 2 mins maximum per question

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Nicest professor I ever met !!!
  • she took the time to personally reach out and offer me an extension
  • she is a really good professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years and both formats give a detailed, consistent picture of a polarizing but often lenient econ instructor.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

BUSC1A30 reviews
BUSC1B10 reviews
BUSC1AH6 reviews
BUS1A3 reviews
BUSC1S1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 6 · A 22 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3