AI Rate Professor

Business

Amanda Martinez

PLGL32 · BUSL18 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you have any other option; you will largely teach yourself under heavy work and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVague RubricsReads Off SlidesTest HeavyMountain of WorkHard Grader
  • Students report almost no real instruction and lectures that just restate slides.
  • Workload and .
  • High letter grades are still possible, but the experience is widely described as a waste of time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students often finish with A-range grades, but , and picky scoring on vague rubrics.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is not elite theory, but the , and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and one says class is a waste because .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Only about one in four would take her again, and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students call her a vague rubrics.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

and reading loads and one student says plan for 40-plus hours a week.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Common themes , and leaving key training as busy work.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments , and exams that carry a large grade share.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

students describe vague and papers, and high-stakes exams with little real teaching.

Main concern

Mountain of work with almost no instruction and .

What students said

“Possibly the worst professor i've had. Doesn't explain anything and is a in the first place.”
PLGL32
“I would suggest avoiding her at all costs.”
BUSL18
“Please ensure you have 40+ hours a week to dedicate to her.”
BUSL18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and long, but reviews do .

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews describe high-weight, long finals that feel like endurance tests if you review the book and slides.

Test heavyLong finalHigh grade weight
“The , and it felt like a test of endurance rather than anything we actually learned.”
BUSL18
“ , but easy if you review the .”
PLGL32

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . The homework and reading load were ridiculous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 online reviews spanning 2024-2025, highlighting weak teaching and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Doesn't explain anything and is a in the first place.”

📚 Workload Shock

12/100

“Please ensure you have 40+ hours a week to dedicate to her.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“I would suggest avoiding her at all costs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Attending class is an absolute waste of time because she just reads straight off the slides.
  • It felt like we were just given a mountain of work with no real instruction.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Rubrics for for minor mistakes.
  • The , and it felt like a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Load

  • The homework and .
  • Get ready to read, Lots of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only four recent online reviews, but they are detailed and highly consistent on heavy work and weak teaching.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUSL182 reviews
PLGL322 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values