Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
46/100Homework and listening can earn solid grades, but 92-93% A , and As.
Online students stress high A thresholds; older in-person students more often say turn in work and listen for an A.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Homework and listening can earn solid grades, but 92-93% A x x x, and x x x x As.
Online students stress high A thresholds; older in-person students more often say turn in work and listen for an A.
Is the course easy?
Material is approachable for many CIS students, but x x x, and weekly tasks add real friction.
Online feels harder because of time structure; x x x x x as straightforward if you pay attention.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance and lecture viewing frequently count via participation, easter eggs, or explicit mandatory flags.
Online async still often forces long timed lecture viewing; x x x x x.
Is this professor recommended?
Roughly three in x x x; strong fans of his humor and clarity outnumber but x x x x x.
In-person recommendations are warmer; recent online reviews are much more likely x x x x x.
Course guide
Grading
Strict
32/100
Tough-grader tags, 92-93% A bars, and x x x x x x x.
Format shift
Online comments are harsher on grading thresholds; some in-person reviews still call x x x x x x.
Workload
Heavy
30/100
x x x x x x, and stacked due dates make the load heavy for many.
Format shift
Online students report 2-hour lectures plus 48-hour homework windows most often.
Teaching experience
Average
56/100
Experienced storyteller with x x x x x x x, and occasional unprofessional feel online.
Format shift
In-person teaching reputation is stronger; online delivery is the main drag on quality.
Assessment method
Balanced
58/100
Mix of x x x x, and exams; some terms lean test-heavy.
Format shift
x x x x x; online adds discussion boards and HonorLock quizzes.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Many in-person students call him funny, knowledgeable, and fair if you participate and x x, though lectures can drag and some find him strict or rude.
Main concern
Long lectures, participation pressure, and occasional harsh or inconsistent tone.
What students said
“Really fun class, was very laid back and learned a lot”
“x x x x.”
“He literally tells you exactly what will be on the exam, if you are paying attention.”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
Online reviews skew negative on long mandatory lectures, x x x x x x, and high A cutoffs.
Main concern
long videos, easter eggs, HonorLock, and heavy weekly pileups.
What students said
“Did I mention that you need to obtain a 92% to get an A in the class”
“He asks the students to use honor lock in all quizzes and tests.”
“His grading system makes no sense. I had x x x x x x x as graded but ended up with a B.”
Exam style
Quizzes and tests are often monitored and can feel stricter than the rest of the course.
Assessment risk
Strict
36/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x x x as important and sometimes poorly supported by study guides, with monitoring mentioned for some online-feeling sections.
“x x x x x x and I will say the study guides were not good at all to prepare someone for the exams.”
“x x x.”
“x x x x if you listen to what he mentioned in classes.”
Online reviews explicitly report HonorLock on quizzes and x x x x x x x x.
“He asks the students to use honor lock in all quizzes and tests.”
“You need to have at least a 93 to get an A.”
“Professor uses HonorLock on quizzes and tests.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“x x x x x if you are asynchronous!!!!!”
“I'm so glad I took x x x x x x x x x!!”
“Publishes 2 hr lectures Tuesdays and Thursday evenings with x x x x as well as "easter eggs" for roll call verification.”
“He asks the students to use honor lock in all quizzes and tests.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
34
Recent reviews read by the AI
34
Lifetime ratings
82/100
Evidence confidence
Thirty-four reviews over many years with repeated themes on lectures, participation, and online rigidity support high credibility despite polarization.
Inside 34 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
20 reported outcomes
A 5 · A- 1
B+ 1 · B 5
C+ 1 · C 1
No reported values
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1