AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hoa LY

MATH71A · MATH160 · POOR · MATH260 · MATH71 · MATH51 · MATH60 · LKAJSASKD · MATH61 · MATH130 · MATH50 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will attend, do weekly homework, and carefully check every step on exams; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStudy guide equals examTough grader on detailsCaring and patientLots of homeworkAccent can confuse
  • and reviews, so prepared students can do well.
  • and willing to help, but many call her a .
  • A and ends up self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Study guides match exams and many report easy As if , though .

Both formats report study-guide-like tests; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is mostly computational and than abstract theory.

; online notes more confusion and homework load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping reviews or lectures hurts.

Online and in as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About three in ; fans love her help and study guides, critics hate clarity and grading.

In-person praise is stronger and more consistent; older online reviews are cooler.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and rigid solution standards mean small arithmetic slips get dinged hard.

Format shift

; online also stresses graded by few things.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly homework can feel lengthy but is usually the .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize lots of questions; in .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and color-coded work, while others find her confusing or hard to understand.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise dominates; online includes tech and board-clarity complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

A tests often described as the make-or-break piece.

Format shift

Both formats describe test-heavy setups with study guides before exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is mostly praised as caring with study guides that and occasional clarity complaints.

Main concern

and some students struggling with accent or confusing explanations.

What students said

“ as the study guide.”
MATH160
“But the calculations”
MATH160
“ have ever had.”
MATH71

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel rushed and tech-awkward, with and mixed fairness praise.

Main concern

Blurry or fast board work and weak .

What students said

“A technologically inept teacher with a complete disconnect to the understanding of her students.”
MATH160
“ .”
MATH130
“Great professor, goes over material well, will spend time after class to help her students.”
MATH71

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and in-class reviews, so preparation is predictable even if .

Study guide equals examIn-class review before testsCalculation-focused gradingFew major exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and review day problems are basically the exam.

Study guide equals examReview day problemsTough on calculation errors
“ as the study guide.”
MATH160
“ .”
MATH260
“ .”
MATH160

Online

Online reviews mention heavy exam weight and .

Test heavyLecture heavyHeavy grader on exams
“Your only hope is the recorded lecture she posts after class.”
MATH160
“ .”
MATH130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hoa Ly is definitely a kind and as the study guide.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 , and caring help. Credibility rating: High.

📘

76/100

“ as the study guide.”

✏️

34/100

“ the calculations”

❤️ Caring Support

72/100

“ and wants you to succeed.”

👍

62/100

“ have ever had.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • color codes her work and does problems straight from the board
  • makes the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is easy to get an A
  • if you do your hw and show up on review days

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • kind and caring professor
  • always willing to help students
  • will spend time after class to help her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

43 reviews across many years and courses with consistent themes on study guides, toughness, and caring support.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 512
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH5112 reviews
MATH508 reviews
MATH718 reviews
MATH1604 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH2602 reviews
MATH612 reviews
423571 review
LKAJSASKD1 review
MATH601 review
MATH71A1 review
POOR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1