AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Randy Haney

PHIL9 · PHIL8 · PHILO5 · PHIL15 · PHIL5 · PHIL3 · PHIL0005 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
77.14%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take him for an if you can sit through story-driven lectures and participate.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyTake-Home ExamsStorytelling LecturesCaring MentorParticipation MattersEasy Philosophy A
  • Most students call him caring, inspirational, and easy if you show up and .
  • Lectures lean on personal stories that some love and others find boring or off-topic.
  • , and a group presentation with free PDF textbook options.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

, and many reported As make high grades common if you complete the , and exams.

; the single online review also says try and pass with an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Content is approachable philosophy with life applications, not technical, though staying engaged with long stories is the real challenge.

Both formats call the class doable or super easy; a .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

, and lectures feed exam context, but some sections treat it more loosely.

In-person evidence is mixed mandatory versus optional; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

About 77% would take again and many call him a .

In-person opinions dominate and are mostly positive; the one online review is strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and quality-focused essay grading keep pressure low.

Format shift

In-person repeatedly calls him lenient or not tough; .

Workload

Light

74/100

; load is a , and a group presentation.

Format shift

; online called the class doable with limited graded items.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Praised as wise, caring, and inspirational, though storytelling lectures bore or confuse a sizable minority.

Format shift

and mostly warm; online called him caring and easy going.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

and a group presentation more than pure high-stakes testing.

Format shift

In-person repeatedly lists 3 take-home exams, 1 essay, 1 presentation; online said graded by few things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person he is widely liked for , and support, though some find lectures long-winded or .

Main concern

Story-heavy lectures and attendance or participation expectations can frustrate students seeking tight structure.

What students said

“ and supportive, take his class”
PHIL9
“ ”
PHIL5
“Talks about himself a lot. Like a lot. Too much almost.”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Pandemic online PHIL5 was easy, caring, and low-stress with a .

Main concern

Only one online review, so format-specific details are thin.

What students said

“Great doable class to take in the middle of a pandemic! Very caring and .”
PHIL5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are almost always take-home, often textbook-supported, making them highly student-friendly.

Take-home examsTake-home finalOpen-book or textbook basedGroup presentationArgumentative essay

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals plus essay and group presentation work.

Take-home midterm and finalTextbook or handout basedOne essayGroup presentation
“ and supportive”
PHIL9
“ , and have a lot of questions.”
PHIL5
“ !”
PHIL5

Online

The single online review does not detail proctoring and mainly reports an easy, low-stress graded load.

Graded by few thingsEasy A if you try
“He's a in the middle of a pandemic. You just have to try and do your work and you'll pass with an A”
PHIL5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“informative class, great instructor, and supportive, take his class”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews emphasizing take-home exams, storytelling lectures, and caring reputation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He really is inspiring and gives you another perspective in life.”

📝

90/100

“ ”

❤️ Caring Personality

88/100

“He is one of the nicest teachers, I'm glad I took him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • uses a lot of storytelling about his past experiences
  • Talks about himself a lot. Like a lot. Too much almost.
  • His lectures and stories are very interesting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you put in the effort
  • hard to fail the class as long as you show up
  • Very lenient.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very caring and supportive
  • cares more about the well being of his students than grades
  • an intelligent man who cares about the students well being

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with , and caring persona provide strong confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 521
3 out of 510
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL533 reviews
PHIL157 reviews
PHIL93 reviews
PHIL00052 reviews
PHIL32 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PHILO52 reviews
PHIL81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 1 · A 25 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 6