AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Weining Cui

CHEM51 · CHEM50 · CHEM40 · CHEM24730 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid for CHEM50/51 if grades matter; stronger fit only if you already know chemistry and can grind a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear expectationsTest material mismatchHeavy quizzes homeworkCaring but confusingPolarizing by course
  • Recent CHEM50/51 and exams unfairly mismatched.
  • Older CHEM40 reviews , and easy labs.
  • Workload is high with , and labs; success needs strong prior chem and steady effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students still earn As, but many say hard work does not protect grades when criteria and tests feel arbitrary.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

High difficulty ratings and comments , and science-major level load.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews list attendance mandatory; a few older notes .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Take-again is about 42% and recent comments if your grade matters.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and random low marks without clear criteria outweigh the clearer older sections.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework, frequent quizzes, lab reports, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Passion and lab help are noted, but .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Test-heavy and not match exams.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All in-person; newer gen-chem reviews skew very negative while .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ !!!”
CHEM50
“ , and wants everyone to succeed.”
CHEM51
“ class.”
CHEM50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent hard quizzes and taught, with some older worksheet-aligned exceptions.

Quizzes from dense slidesTests beyond lectureLab reportsSome worksheet-aligned quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests covering unseen material, though some older sections mirrored worksheets.

Frequent hard quizzesMaterial not in classWorksheet-aligned in some older sections
“Stuff that were never and exams.”
CHEM50
“Quizzes and .”
CHEM40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting recent gen-chem pain versus older support. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

38/100

“ !!!!”

📝

28/100

“ and marks you off later.”

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“ , and wants everyone to succeed.”

📚

30/100

“A lot of quizzes as well, you only get a few days to study 20+ slides before the next one.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does
  • love this class! lectures are easy to follow.
  • Extremely boring lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class.
  • even if you are a hard worker theres no guarantee that you can pass this class with a good grade.
  • Got an A overall but !!!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Kind, caring, and sweet Professor.
  • Very nice and caring professor.
  • She should not teaching at the college.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

12 detailed in-person reviews from 2017-2025 show a consistent recent negative shift against some older positives.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM505 reviews
CHEM514 reviews
CHEM402 reviews
CHEM247301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1