AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Corinne Hartmann

ARTC100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you will treat an intro design course like a precision job; casual learners should look elsewhere.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPixel-Level GraderHeavy HomeworkIntro but HarshClear RubricsNot for Casual Art
  • , and even pixel-level details.
  • Workload is heavy for an intro graphic design class, especially compressed terms.
  • Students who follow instructions exactly can still succeed and and helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Even diligent students report C or F range returns for tiny technical slips, so an A requires near-perfect precision and heavy time.

Both online and ; online has more withdrawal and incomplete outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Labeled introductory, yet students describe professional-level nitpicking and high time demand.

Online and reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and one online success review says attend class for tips; others report non-mandatory online attendance.

; online is mixed between mandatory summer and non-mandatory terms.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Only a ; most warn that the class demoralizes beginners despite clear rubrics.

The two positive recommenders span online summer and in-person winter; the rest of both formats are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Repeated reports of docking for , and pixel accuracy make grading feel punitive for an intro course.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework and accelerated winter or summer pacing leave little room for other classes if you aim high.

Format shift

Online and ; .

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

, and accessible when students engage, but many feel unsupported when grades come back harshly or emails go unanswered.

Format shift

Online has more help and email complaints; in person splits hard between love and hate.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The course is project and file-submission driven with .

Format shift

; grading focuses on design deliverables.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person opinions split between a D- and an A student who found her sweet but intense and exacting.

Main concern

errors.

What students said

“literally marked off points for having ONE misspelled word in my files”
ARTC100
“She is a and lets you know EXACTLY how she wants assignments named / done.”
ARTC100

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviewers and heavy work, with one strong summer success story for students who ask for help and follow rubrics.

Main concern

Pixel-and-font nitpicking plus weak email response can tank grades and motivation.

What students said

“She quite literally is counting pixels and marking you off for it.”
ARTC100
“ having a 0.5 difference in font size”
ARTC100
“The and went over assignments in class.”
ARTC100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not describe classic proctored exams; risk comes from ultra-strict .

Project BasedRubric StrictFile Naming Rules

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and naming rules rather than formal exams.

Exact File NamingNo Half Credit for Confusion
“doesn't even give you half credit for ”
ARTC100

Online

Online evidence is about assignment rubrics and .

Strict Project RubricsPixel Accuracy
“Grades pixel by pixel.”
ARTC100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She quite literally is counting pixels and marking you off for it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (4 online, 2 in and heavy intro workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Really sweet Professor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“docked points for having a 0.5 difference in font size”

📚 Workload Load

22/100

“get ready to invest all your attention and time to an intro design class.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hartmann is a
  • You could spend hours on an assignment and get a
  • Pretty demoralizing when the class is considered an introductory class

Theme 2

📋 About Expectations

  • lets you know
  • Don't be afraid to ask for help

Theme 3

😓 About Student Stress

  • Never thought I would need to withdrawl from an Art class
  • this class makes me not want to do that anymore
  • because it was my lowest grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews limit certainty, but the harsh-grading and heavy-work themes are highly consistent across online and in-person comments.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARTC1006 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1