AI Rate Professor

Design

Elisabeth Eatman

ID100 · ID12 · ID105 · ID170 · ID10 · ID25 · ID130 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you will follow rubrics closely and handle critique; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear RubricsProject Heavy ID WorkTough Taste-Based GradingOrganized ProfessionalPolarizing Presence
  • and rubrics matter more than personal taste alone.
  • , and helpful if you follow directions.
  • Critics cite condescension, changing expectations, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

High grades require precise rubric-following on many projects, not casual effort or pure creativity.

One online student found an A straightforward; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Intro ID can feel approachable, but deeper and .

intro online or ID10 experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is necessary and .

; online evidence is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; fit depends on whether you accept strict professional critique.

Online recent reviews are more negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

, but and tough standards still feel strict to many.

Format shift

; online complains more about support than points.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Interior design projects, materials, and .

Format shift

Both formats call ID work heavy; advanced in-person studios sound heaviest.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and help for some students contrast with condescension reports from others.

Format shift

; online has sharper availability complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Projects and studio work drive grades far more than traditional exams.

Format shift

True across online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person design students describe , and mixed fairness of aesthetic grading.

Main concern

Heavy projects and grades that can sink if her design taste is not matched.

What students said

“Elisa is a good teacher and she is a . To get an A, what you need to and don't miss/late schools.”
ID12
“She's a . Takes the time to help you individually.”
ID25
“even though $$ and time to do it, you worked hard, but if She doesn't like it, She will give you bad grade.”
ID130

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between one strong praise for and two harsh reports of low engagement or condescension.

Main concern

Perceived lack of availability or dismissive answers when students ask for help.

What students said

“I believe Professor Elisabeth Eatman should not continue teaching ID 60: Real Estate Styling because she consistently demonstrates a lack of availability and engagement with her students.”
ID100
“Not sure why a lot of people say shes a , as long as you do the work correctly and how she described, youll get an A!”
ID10
“When I would ask questions she would look annoyed and would make me feel stupid... terrible teacher”
ID25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is project and reviews.

Project RubricsExtra CreditAttendance-Linked GradesStudio Critiques

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and following posted examples or rubrics.

Studio ProjectsRubric GradingAttendance Penalties
“ , but that is w/ all classes in this program. However, she always puts out an example of the project for students.”
ID25
“I got an A but missed class several times.. i got a C.”
ID105

Online

Online comments emphasize assignment correctness and engagement more than proctored exams.

Project AssignmentsClear Work Directions
“as long as you do the work correctly and how she described, youll get an A!”
ID10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a . Takes the time to help you individually.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 design-program reviews with limited online sample and long time span. Credibility rating: Medium.

📐

40/100

“To get an A, what you need to and don't miss/late schools.”

😤 Polarizing Support Style

45/100

“When I would ask questions she would look annoyed and would make me feel stupid... terrible teacher”

👍 Professional Structure

60/100

“She is funny, engaging, and willing to help you along your educational goals.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's really good and professional teacher... Good and .
  • . Often difficult instructions, drawn out and outdated assignments.
  • Liz was a really effective teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She has REALLY higher expectation!
  • All Interior Design classes require a lot of work.
  • She is .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and .
  • She is polite, respectful & very professional towards students.
  • not a !!!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews over many years show stable polarization, but older sparse comments and few online cases keep credibility medium.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ID1005 reviews
ID104 reviews
ID254 reviews
ID1052 reviews
ID1302 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ID121 review
ID1701 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1