AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohamad Kassab

MATH71 · MATH110 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless ; in-person is safer if you can handle strict structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught mathExam-only gradingPearson requiredUnapproachable onlineStrict classroom
  • Online MATH sections are largely self-taught with , and .
  • Multiple students dropped online sections citing little help and rude or sparse communication.
  • and an Easy A is possible if you follow his methods.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

In person an A is reachable by matching board problems, but online grades rest on a .

; and exam-only stress.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings cluster high online, and content feels hard when teaching support is thin.

Online difficulty is much higher in student experience than the two in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, while in-person tags warn skipping means you will not pass.

; in-person is effectively mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Would-take-again sits near 43% with strong in-person yeses and .

; online consensus is avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and , but sparse graded items leave little recovery room.

Format shift

In-person has some safety nets; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework can be optional online, yet .

Format shift

Online HW optional but ; .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

In-person teaching is described as thorough, but the larger online sample calls lectures unhelpful screenshots and support nearly absent.

Format shift

in-person good, online poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Multiple reviews say grades depend almost only on a few exams and a .

Format shift

; online is extreme about few graded items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person MATH71 is strict but clear: thorough lessons, weekly HW, no phones, and an Easy A if and follow his methods.

Main concern

Strict classroom control can feel intimidating when asking for help.

What students said

“ if not all sample problems on .”
MATH71
“Kassab is a good professor especially for those who aren't the . He won't go on until everybody understands the lesson.”
MATH71

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH110/71 leans self-learning on Pearson with and .

Main concern

Little instructional support, unhelpful lecture videos, and grades based almost only on a few exams.

What students said

“I would suggest not taking his online only courses, they're literally just screen shot slides from the book that you have to figure out on your own”
MATH110
“He does not care if you pass or fail. Almost everything is on pearson so he doesn't grade.”
MATH110
“Be prepared to teach yourself.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk is high because a .

Test heavyExam and final onlyPearson homeworkIn-person board problems match tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and book problems; lowest test can be replaced by a , but attendance and method fidelity matter.

Board problems match testsWeekly HWReplace lowest test with finalMust follow his methods
“most if not all sample problems on . Weekly HW. Replaces lowest test with if higher.”
MATH71

Online

Online and a final through Pearson-centered self-study, with little other graded buffer.

Three exams plus finalOptional HWPearson platformLecture videos not helpful
“ and .”
MATH110
“Grade depends only on 3 exams and 1 final.”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would suggest not taking his online only courses, they're literally just screen shot slides from the book that you have to figure out on your own”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (5 online, 2 in person), highlighting the . Credibility rating: Medium.

💻

20/100

“Be prepared to teach yourself.”

🧪

25/100

“Grade depends only on 3 exams and 1 final.”

🏫 In-Person Strength

75/100

“He won't go on until everybody understands the lesson.”

🚫 Support Gap

15/100

“Prof. and seems irritated if .”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • they're
  • He does not care if you pass or fail.
  • Professor dropped me from the course for no reason, without a refund.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫

  • Each lesson is a explained thoroughly.
  • Doesn't tolerate goofing around, phones, or speaking unless it's a question about a math problem.
  • Good teacher overall and .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and .
  • easy A . Weekly HW. if higher.
  • Very heavy on the self learning, if that works for you, this class is perfect.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews with strong format contrast and detailed online complaints, but .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1104 reviews
MATH713 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1