AI Rate Professor

Geology

Mehrad Koohikamali

GEOG10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Usable for an online GIS intro if you are self-directed, but expect uneven course packaging and thin evidence overall.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAsync GIS IntroQuick Zoom HelpRepurposed ContentLight Graded LoadMixed Course Polish
  • Only two online reviews exist, and and incomplete COVID-era materials.
  • Both students earned an A, suggesting grades are attainable with moderate effort.
  • Course feels asynchronous and self-directed with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, suggesting grades are reachable without extreme effort.

All evidence comes from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Intro GIS is treated as manageable asynchronous work rather than a conceptual grind.

Only online reviews inform this judgment.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

as not mandatory for this asynchronous online class.

Evidence is entirely from online sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and access, while the other found the course poorly assembled.

Split opinions appear only in online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Both students received an A, but comments give little detail on rubrics or leniency beyond low graded volume.

Format shift

Online-only evidence; no in-person comparison.

Workload

Light

72/100

Tagged as graded by few things with moderate difficulty and asynchronous pacing.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Helpful and available on Zoom for one student, but another found lectures and materials incomplete and repurposed.

Format shift

Only online experiences are available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize reading and few graded .

Format shift

Online-only and sparse detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online GEOG10 is asynchronous with quick Zoom help for some students, but others found the materials repurposed and incomplete.

Main concern

Course content can feel disjointed and .

What students said

“An intro to GIS class which is asynchronous but and .”
GEOG10
“the course felt disjointed and incomplete, almost like we were getting a heavily trimmed down, Frankensteined version”
GEOG10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the course felt disjointed and incomplete, almost like we were getting a heavily trimmed down, Frankensteined version of what used to be a more comprehensive class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting supportiveness versus incomplete materials. Credibility rating: Low.

🖥️ Online Support

70/100

“ and .”

📦 Course Packaging

30/100

“Class material was repurposed of contents the professor had originally recorded during COVID for Cal Poly Pomona.”

🅰️ Grade Outcome

78/100

“A”

Theme 1

🌐 About Online Delivery

  • asynchronous but
  • repurposed of contents the professor had originally recorded during COVID

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • Graded by few things
  • both students reported an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two very recent online reviews with conflicting quality judgments make the picture thin and unstable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GEOG102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values