AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Deanna Bowman

LEARN49 · LERN49 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Good for math-anxious students who show up and , but the newest AI-accusation review is a real caution.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPractice tests match examsMath anxiety helperCan overcomplicateHelpful when engagedPolarizing recent AI grading
  • Older LERN49/LEARN49 reviews mostly praise clear help, easy As, and .
  • A 2025 review accuses her of AI and plagiarism claims without proof and labels her a .
  • , so recommendation rests on mixed qualitative comments only.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Multiple students say she is not a hard grader and if you attend and .

All evidence is in-person; the 2025 review is the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Course is developmental math that many call easy once explained, though some say she overcomplicates concepts.

All evidence is in-person across LERN49/LEARN49.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Some reviews require attendance; others say as long as you go and policy.

All evidence is in-person; tags and comments are mixed on mandatory status.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Older students love her for making math easy, but negative reviews on help style and the 2025 AI dispute pull recommendation down.

All evidence is in-person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Most historical reviews call her not a tests.

Format shift

2025 review claims tough grading via AI and plagiarism accusations without proof.

Workload

Light

75/100

Homework and notes matter, but overall load is described as manageable for a basic math course.

Format shift

One recent tag says so many papers; older math and practice tests.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

, and helpful for math fear; others say she complicates math or sends students to the lab instead of helping.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person and spans 2014-2025 with a sharp recent negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Practice tests, homework, and or pure projects.

Format shift

; 2025 mentions papers and AI checks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Mostly beginner math-success stories with practice tests and math or does not help in class, plus one 2025 AI/plagiarism dispute.

Main concern

Recent accusation of and inconsistent teaching clarity.

What students said

“ if you are not good at math!”
LERN49
“"PRACTICE" TESTS ARE GOLDEN! THE .”
LEARN49
“accuses of ai with no proof and plagirisim”
LEARN49

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

exams, which makes testing student-friendly.

Practice tests nearly identicalHomework-based prep

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

to multiple older reviews.

Practice tests match exams
“She gives practice test which are almost identical to the test!”
LERN49
“THE .”
LEARN49

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are not good at math!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, weighting both long-run beginner-math praise and the single recent negative. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“She teaches in a clear and concise manner.”

📈 Easy For Math Anxiety

80/100

“I have always felt like I would never understand math, but Mrs. Bowman has proven me wrong.”

⚠️

25/100

“accuses of ai with no proof and plagirisim”

📝 Practice Tests

85/100

“"PRACTICE" TESTS ARE GOLDEN! THE .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the work easy to understand.
  • She complicates math more then it has to be.
  • She is always there to help, but and pay attention.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • it is easy to get an A
  • She is not a
  • As long as you go to .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recent Concerns

  • accuses of ai with no proof and plagirisim

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews exist but most are old (2014-2015) with only one 2025 comment, so consistency is moderate and recent signal is thin.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

LERN494 reviews
LEARN493 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1