AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Rebecca Wetzstein

ENGR1 · ENGR101 · ENG26207 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take her intro engineering class for projects and career overview, but expect and watch for heavier online workload.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGroup projectsExtra creditEasy A potentialClear lecturesMixed grading strictness
  • Most students find ENGR1 chill, project-based, and easy to ace with participation
  • and straightforward assignments help grades, but one recent and heavy work
  • Great fit for students exploring engineering fields rather than seeking a pure theory grind

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students report easy A or guaranteed A with completed work and , despite one harsh-grading outlier.

In person is consistently easy A; online is mostly easy but .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Content is introductory engineering overview with simple projects and .

Both formats describe beginner-level work; the harsh online review is the main exception.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and one tells students to be on time.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Nine of ten reviews are strongly positive with .

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Many students cite and easy A outcomes, but a minority call her a .

Format shift

In person looks more consistently lenient; online evidence is mixed.

Workload

Light

70/100

Most say work is simple and not time-consuming, though one online review reports lots of homework.

Format shift

In person sounds light; one recent .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students , and support for future engineers.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats aside from one harsh online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Group projects, individual assignments, participation, and drive .

Format shift

Project and and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ENGR1 is described as , and easy to get an A with group work and .

Main concern

and being on time matters.

What students said

“Such an easy class! She makes it so easy to get an A while still keeping her lectures interesting!”
ENGR1
“The work is simple, and the .”
ENGR1

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are mostly praised as , though one recent review calls her a tough grader with .

Main concern

One recent and heavy work.

What students said

“Easy A.”
ENGR1
“As long as you do the required work, getting an A is guaranteed.”
ENG26207
“Really bad. Claims she wants to help us but floods us with work and grades really harshly.”
ENGR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on projects, participation, and .

Group projectsExtra creditParticipationAssignments

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is mostly group projects and .

Group projectsIndividual assignmentsExtra credit
“There are and .”
ENGR1
“The work is simple, and the .”
ENGR1

Online

Online reviews emphasize doing required work, group projects, and easy A opportunities without describing proctored exams.

Group projectsExtra creditRequired work
“Easy A.”
ENGR1
“As long as you do the required work, getting an A is guaranteed.”
ENG26207

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you do the required work, getting an A is guaranteed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews split between online and in , and one harsh outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Professor Wetzsteins lectures are straight , and very informative.”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

82/100

“Such an easy class! She makes it so easy to get an A while still keeping her lectures interesting!”

⚠️ Outlier Risk

25/100

“Really bad. Claims she wants to help us but floods us with work and grades really harshly.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very interesting lectures and they help you in the future.
  • She was very friendly and insightful.
  • She really just wants you to learn and succeed as an engineer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A.
  • The work is simple, and the .
  • .

Theme 3

🧩 About Course Format

  • There are and .
  • We worked as groups all semester and it was very satisfying class to complete.
  • Make sure to be on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

10 recent-enough reviews split evenly by format show a , but one strong negative outlier reduces full confidence.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR18 reviews
ENG262071 review
ENGR1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values