AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Eric Pachas

MATH110H · MATH71 · MATH181 · 10906MATH · MATH110 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
13.04%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

if you have any other math option; most students say you will teach .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAvoid At All CostsSlow GraderHarsh GradingWeak LecturingTest Heavy
  • Most students report minimal useful teaching and .
  • and harsh, with many Fs, Ds, and withdrawals.
  • A small minority of , but recent consensus is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Grades skew heavily toward F, D, C, and withdrawals, with and no-extra-credit comments.

Online reviews are especially filled with Fs and ; .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Students describe rushed complex math, test spikes, and .

Both formats rate difficulty extremely high; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory even when students say class time itself teaches little.

Both online and as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

13/100

Only a ; recent comments repeatedly say take anyone else or .

Online is almost uniformly hostile; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Tough grader tags dominate, with , and almost no .

Format shift

Online and ; online adds multi-week delays.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and .

Format shift

and test load; online also mentions packets and papers.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students say he barely teaches, reads the book, grades slowly, and .

Format shift

In-person focuses on bad lectures; and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Courses are repeatedly tagged test heavy with quizzes and .

Format shift

and test spikes; online also tags test-heavy and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person lectures are often called rushed or , and sudden difficulty spikes after the .

Main concern

Weak in-class teaching plus tough tests leave .

What students said

“Unless your good at learning complex math exclusively through worksheets with very little lecture than your in trouble.”
MATH110
“He would barely actually teach and if he did he would rush through everything”
MATH110
“Around the . We went from a single test in 2 months to 2 tests and a quiz in 3 weeks.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online math sections are widely described as avoid-at-all-costs experiences with , and poor communication.

Main concern

, and harsh marks make online success feel out of reach.

What students said

“ !”
MATH71
“ . Takes one month to grade the .”
10906MATH
“He isn't lenient on grading nor does he give out any to help you.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is exam-heavy and unforgiving, with limited study support and .

Test HeavyPop QuizzesFormula Sheet SometimesStudy Guide for Final Only

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes feel long and tough; study guides may appear only for the final, and classwork is not always posted.

Test HeavyQuiz SurprisesLimited Study GuidesFormula Sheet Sometimes
“You don't get study guide for the .”
Math110H
“Notified of 15 minutes before class”
MATH110
“I had to study a lot for tests and quizzes because they're long and he is a .”
MATH71

Online

Online reviews stress harsh testing and grading but do not clearly document webcam or Lockdown Browser rules.

Test HeavyHarsh GradingPop Quizzes
“This professor is definitely the toughest professor I had this year.”
MATH110
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH181

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 math reviews across online and , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

13/100

“ !!!”

🐢

14/100

“ . Takes one month to grade the .”

📉 Weak Teaching

18/100

“He would barely actually teach and if he did he would rush through everything”

🧪 Test Pressure

28/100

“Around the . We went from a single test in 2 months to 2 tests and a quiz in 3 weeks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • does nothing but read from the textbook with his head down the entire class time
  • You will learn more watching YouTube or literally just doing the .
  • You can tell he loves math and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • One of the .
  • . Does not give feed backs and
  • He isn't lenient on grading nor does he give out any

Theme 3

⏱️

  • Slow grader no dropped.
  • Takes one month to grade the .
  • He is very slow at updating grades and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

23 reviews with strong grade and quality consistency, including many recent harsh reports across online and in-person formats.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH1107 reviews
MATH1816 reviews
Math110H5 reviews
MATH713 reviews
10906MATH2 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

9

F 9

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 5