AI Rate Professor

Architecture amp Engineering

Nadim Atani

ARCH102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Only take him if and and are ready to fully commit to the studio culture.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderMandatory AttendanceLecture HeavyPolarizing PersonalityHolds Grudges
  • Two of three reviews call him extremely rude, petty, and a tough grader in ARCH102.
  • and missing class can permanently hurt your standing.
  • One student found him highly supportive if you show ambition and hard work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and few graded items mean an A takes consistent excellence with little room for error.

All evidence is from in-person ARCH102 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students rate difficulty high and describe a demanding, lecture-heavy architecture studio environment.

All evidence is from in-person ARCH102 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as mandatory and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

All evidence is from in-person ARCH102 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and most comments warn others away despite one glowing review.

All evidence is from in-person ARCH102 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and reports of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lecture-heavy studio with homework piles.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Quality scores swing from 1 to 5 with majority describing him as unapproachable or reputation-focused.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Graded by few things suggests major projects or limited high-stakes deliverables drive the grade.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ARCH102 is polarizing: one student calls him inspiring and supportive, while two describe him as rude, petty with grades, and unapproachable.

Main concern

and reports of holding grudges after absences.

What students said

“ ! He is extremely rude and petty with grading.”
ARCH102
“If you show Nadim that you are willing to work and have an ambitious mindset, he will 100% reciprocate that energy.”
ARCH102
“He grades really tough. . Very strict.”
ARCH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize tough, few-item grading in .

Few Graded ItemsProject-Heavy Studio

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded items, not formal exam software.

Tough Project GradingGraded by Few Things
“He grades really tough. . Very strict.”
ARCH102
“ ”
ARCH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He is extremely rude and petty with grading.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization in . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

38/100

“He doesn't care about helping you he just cares about his reputation”

📉 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ ! He is extremely rude and petty with grading.”

❤️ Supportive Side

80/100

“Nadim is an absolutely awesome professor, and cares about what he teaches you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture heavy
  • Overall a very supportive professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He grades really tough.
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

⚠️

  • If you miss class for any reason he will hold a grudge
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • Very strict.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2021-2025 with sharp disagreement and limited grade detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ARCH1023 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1