AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Scott Guth

110S · MATH280 · MATH285 · MATH110H · MATH70S · MATH181 · STATS110 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MAT285 · MATH260 · MATH110S · 189 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
56.58%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Strong pick for stats if ; be cautious in calculus unless and can absorb huge problem sets.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkStudy Guides Match ExamsClear Grading CriteriaPolarizing by CourseDrops Lowest Exam
  • Stats (MATH110) students often praise clear lectures, study guides, and achievable As.
  • Higher calculus courses draw heavy criticism for and weak lectures.
  • practice-heavy but time-consuming.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Stats often becomes an A with study-guide practice and drops, while calculus As and solid test performance.

Online evidence is thinner and harsher; most .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content ranges from approachable elementary stats to demanding calculus and differential equations.

; online sample is small and more negative.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, though some say low attendance still worked and he posts lectures.

Both online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

60/100

About half would take him again, with strong stats love offset by calculus workload complaints.

; online and higher-calc reviews are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but some courses feel tough and test-weighted.

Format shift

sections.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Across courses students report massive weekly problem sets and multi-hundred-item packets.

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and humorous with excellent notes; a large minority find lectures boring or textbook-read.

Format shift

In-person stats praise is strongest; online and some calc reviews rate teaching much lower.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

but often a smaller grade share while midterms and .

Format shift

Consistent across formats; online MATH110H explicitly weights tests heavily.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is beloved in stats for step-by-step notes and , but polarizing in calc for and uneven lecture clarity.

Main concern

and grades often lean test-heavy.

What students said

“Study and they're 20pts .”
MATH110
“150-200 problem .”
MATH280
“He does give a lot of homework, but it is exactly what .”
110

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and weaker access or support than many in-person fans describe.

Main concern

Online reviews report ton of , and harder-to-reach support.

What students said

“The professor assigns a ton of homework, but if you stay on top of it and use resources like unstuck study, you can get through the class.”
MATH181
“Doesn't answer emails, very inaccessible (even through the pandemic).”
MATH110H

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually mirror study guides and , but remain high-stakes.

Study Guides Match ExamsDrop Lowest ExamTest HeavySome Open Notes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some stats sections allow notes or .

Study Guides Match ExamsDrop Lowest ExamOpen Notes Sometimes
“ , and open-notes.”
MATH110
“Believe me, as long as you follow the teacher's rules for this course, you will get a good score, and .”
MATH110
“ but they do contain atleast 1 proof question or potentially none.”
280

Online

Online comments stress test-heavy weighting and .

Test HeavyHeavy Homework Share Low
“3 midterms 20% of overall grade, and final is 25%.”
MATH110H
“Lectures can be dry, so and YouTube for supplementary learning.”
MATH181

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does give a lot of homework, but it is exactly what .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in . Credibility rating: High.

📚

24/100

“150-200 problem .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He clearly goes over the work (step by step).”

👍 Recommendation Split

60/100

“I couldn't have asked for a better professor. If you have the .”

📝

78/100

“Study and they're 20pts .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • His lectures assumed that students already understood the material
  • He teaches math like no other.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Study
  • , but lecture was boring and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Policies

  • always willing to push back the deadlines

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

189

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and course levels with and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5108
4 out of 524
3 out of 518
2 out of 515
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH11010 reviews
MATH1808 reviews
MATH1817 reviews
MATH2805 reviews
1104 reviews
Show 10 more courses
2803 reviews
MATH2603 reviews
MAT2852 reviews
MATH110H2 reviews
110S1 review
2851 review
MATH110S1 review
MATH2851 review
MATH70S1 review
STATS1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 6 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

7

B 6 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1