AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Kristina Fritz

PSYCH1AH · PSYC14 · PSYCH14 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Consider her only if and accept mixed organization plus AI-flagging risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed reviewsAI accusation riskReading heavyFast-paced short termsQuiz and exam focused
  • , and recommendable, while recent short-term courses report chaos.
  • Students can earn solid grades if they keep up with readings and quizzes, but AI accusations worry several.
  • Eight-week and winter formats feel rushed with dense chapter loads and inconsistent syllabus messaging.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students report A or A- and quizzes, but AI flags and tough moments reduce reliability.

Most grade evidence is online; the +.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Content itself is often called easy, though short terms pile on chapters quickly.

Online comments emphasize easy content with ; in-person difficulty was low.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

as not mandatory, though some older online and in-person notes say yes.

Online ; in-person listed mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Older students recommend her, but recent online reviews warn about disorganization and AI accusations.

Recommendation is more positive in older online and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call her not a , while and AI-based penalties.

Format shift

; the in-person review is positive.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly quizzes, readings, and short-term chapter loads create steady work without always being crushing.

Format shift

Online short terms feel heavier than the older in-person description.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching is described as chill and , but , and unhelpful by others.

Format shift

Online recent reviews are cooler; the single in-person review is glowing.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and multi-chapter exams.

Format shift

Online is quiz and assignment heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single in-person review is strongly , and and journal work.

Main concern

, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“I'm currently taking Psych 14 with her, and she's awesome.”
PSYC14

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews split between easy weekly work and stressful rushed 8-week terms with closed-book exams and AI accusations.

Main concern

Course organization and .

What students said

“8-week course was rushed. Near the end, we had to study 3-4 chapters per week, and each exam covered 6-8 chapters.”
PSYC14
“she has a weird tendency to accuse her students of AI, even when its their own work.”
PSYC14
“Not a and overall a very chill and understanding teacher to have.”
PSYCH1AH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and report of closed-book online exams.

Closed book examsWeekly quizzesStudy guide mixed usefulnessTimed quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final that are somewhat by the book, plus journal reviews.

Two exams and finalStudy slides and notesJournal reviews
“Two exams and the final, and a couple of journal reviews. The , so make sure to study the slides and .”
PSYC14

Online

Online comments report closed-book exams in one section, weekly timed quizzes, and .

Closed book examsWeekly quizzesTimed 15-minute quizzesHeavy chapter exams
“All exams were closed book, but after the was open book”
PSYC14
“There was a quiz of 10 questions with a 15 min time limit due every week”
PSYCH1AH

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she has a weird tendency to accuse her students of AI, even when its their own work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (6 online, 1 in person), highlighting split quality, AI risk, and short-term pacing. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Mixed Recommendation

46/100

“ ”

⚠️ AI Accusation Risk

30/100

“she accused my work of being made by AI. ”

📚 Reading and Quiz Load

48/100

“Every week she gives out 2-3 assignments (one of them usually being a discussion board)”

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

50/100

“overall a very chill and understanding teacher to have.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is lovely.
  • the course was stressful and disorganized
  • she's super sweet

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class itself is not hard, in fact it was easy
  • Not a

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization Risks

  • forgot that it was a 8 week course
  • Study guide is unhelpful
  • accuse her students of AI

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews with clear format split and , but and mixed years.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYC144 reviews
PSYCH142 reviews
PSYCH1AH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1