AI Rate Professor

Communication

Franciella Jaimes

SPCH1A · COM1100 · SPECH1 · SP1 · SPEEC101 · SPEECH1A · COM100 · SPCH26 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Prefer another speech professor if possible, especially for online; if you can self-manage heavy outlines and strict rubrics.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnorganized CanvasTough Speech GraderEmail Black HoleAttendance CriticalPolarizing Speech Prof
  • Recent online , and picky speech grading.
  • Older in-person reviews often call the class manageable and confidence-building if you prepare.
  • Workload for an intro speech course is frequently called too heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Prepared students can earn As, but picky outlines and speech deductions block free high grades.

; older in-person reviews more often call it an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, but , and multiple speeches add real load for an intro class.

Online students report heavier-than-expected workload; many in-person students call it manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and speech-day punctuality strongly affect grades, with late speech penalties noted.

speech-day rules in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and recent comments urge choosing anyone else, especially online.

Online recommendation is strongly negative; and newer caution.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students report docking for tiny outline and performance details and rarely awarding perfect scores.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize nitpicky grading .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

, and papers feel excessive for intro oral communication.

Format shift

Online students especially call the workload outsized; .

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some find her supportive and confidence-building, while many criticize organization, attitude, and email silence.

Format shift

Online teaching experience scores worse than the broader in-person archive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grade centers on speeches, outlines, and process work, with midterms and finals also appearing.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize speeches; online adds more reading and tests for some students.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

hard grading and bad attitude; older reviews are warmer than many recent ones.

Main concern

and uneven organization still appear in person.

What students said

“I dreaded taking this class but I did learn a lot and her class helped me.”
SPCH1A
“Avoid. There are kinder professors.”
SPCH1A
“It was an easy A.”
SPCH1A

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw strong complaints about chaos, delayed email replies, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ . When I meant VERY, I meant really really.”
SPCH1A
“This professor has not replied to my emails for around 2 weeks!”
SPCH1A
“ professor.”
SPCH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes graded speeches and outlines with standard written tests; .

Speech performancesOutline rubricsMidterm and finalChapter quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final content from notes or textbook chapters.

Multiple speechesMidterm and finalBook-heavy testsGroup speech activities
“She also has a midterm and .”
COM1100
“midterm and .”
SPCH1A

Online

Online reviews mention relatively easy finals but harsh speech and outline scoring; .

Speech performancesOutline deductionsRelatively easy finals
“ though.”
SPCH1A
“ speech outlines and speech performances.”
SPCH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . When I meant VERY, I meant really really. And extra workloads for just an oral communication class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews comparing recent online speech complaints with . Credibility rating: High.

📧 Communication Failure

25/100

“This professor has not replied to my emails for around 2 weeks!”

📝

34/100

“ speech outlines and speech performances.”

🌈 Confidence Builder (In Person)

70/100

“she makes everyone feel comfortable and helps you with anything you might have trouble with!”

👎 Overall Recommendation

34/100

“ and tried to discuss options for passing class, said oh well and failed me”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • and
  • never
  • So much work goes into this class when it is just an introductory course.

Theme 2

🎤 About Speeches & Grades

  • No matter how good your speeches are, you can never get 100
  • I thought I get an A but the .
  • Follow her guidelines for the assignments and you will do fine.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Feel

  • the classroom environment was comfortable.
  • She is a really good professor.
  • Ask her a question only to get a rude response.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-three reviews over many years include strong recent online detail and .

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 514

Course coverage

SPCH1A29 reviews
SPEEC1013 reviews
SPEECH1A3 reviews
COM1002 reviews
COM11002 reviews
Show 3 more courses
SP12 reviews
SPCH261 review
SPECH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 9 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 6

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1