AI Rate Professor

Art

Antony Pai

ANIM108 · ART63 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you already have strong design or animation skills and can meet professional-level expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough subjective graderVague rubricsHeavy projectsAvoid for intro designInconsistent feedback
  • Many students report and vague rubrics in ART63
  • Projects are taxing; small mistakes can tank scores
  • A minority of and clarity when they already have skill

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Students say one small mistake can crush a grade and intro work is graded at professional standards.

Both online and ; a few ANIM students report better outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and steep creative standards make the work hard.

; online ART63 also stresses tough perfect execution.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory and punish early leaving, while .

Mixed signals appear in both online and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and multiple detailed reviews say stay and poor communication.

Online and ; positive notes cluster in some ANIM sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

; rubrics feel vague and subjective with .

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints dominate both formats, with rare mentions.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Major projects and ; many students fail to fully finish finals.

Format shift

; online also reports demanding assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A few call him energetic and helpful, but many cite weak teaching, , and poor communication.

Format shift

Online tutorials are often panned; in-person ART63 communication complaints are strongest.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades revolve around major creative projects and rubrics more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats center project deliverables and example-based expectations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ART63 reviews urge avoidance for ; ANIM108 is mixed with some strong fans of projects and feedback.

Main concern

Professional expectations in intro classes and .

What students said

“ . Turned me off to graphic design”
ART63
“the midterm and ”
ANIM108

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and demotivating best-work comparisons.

Main concern

Unfair subjective scoring and weak teaching videos for beginners.

What students said

“Grades very unfairly and it mainly seems opinionated”
ART63
“This prof is not an artist and does not understand the material he is teaching”
ANIM108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and high-stakes finals rather than described proctoring software.

Major projectsTaxing midterm and finalSubjective rubric grading

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person features taxing midterm and and subjective rubrics.

Midterm projectFinal projectVague rubrics
“the midterm and ”
ANIM108
“His rubrics are vague and his grades are subjective”
ART63

Online

Online comments do not detail webcam or Lockdown tools; risk is unfair project scoring and weak tutorials.

Project gradingOpinionated scoresTutorial videos
“I would receive full marks for projects but still not get a perfect score?”
ART63
“A single mistake can lose you 25% from an assignment”
ANIM108

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Turned me off to graphic design.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (4 online, 8 in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“Wish I checked RMP before taking this class”

⚖️

16/100

“One small mistake can severely affect your overall grade”

🛠️ Teaching Clarity

30/100

“Terrible communicator with frequent errors and which deeply impacts the students”

Theme 1

📉

  • His rubrics are vague and his grades are subjective
  • Grades very unfairly and it mainly seems opinionated
  • A single mistake can lose you 25% from an assignment

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • This professor doesn't really teach much
  • I much rather would've learned this course off of a YouTuber
  • Loved his teaching style, he often shows other students work

Theme 3

💼 About Expectations

  • he expects professional work
  • the midterm and
  • Your boundaries are tested for creativity

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews with consistent tough-grader language, multiple thumbs-up on critical posts, and both formats covered make the negative pattern credible.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ART637 reviews
ANIM1085 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2