AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Natasha Ramos Bernal

POL110 · POLI9 · POLI103 · POL9 · POLI25 · POLI1 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will keep up with and study guides; online and accelerated sections are much riskier.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate lecturesHeavy reading loadStudy-guide examsLate and disorganizedPolarizing grading
  • Older in-person students praise inspiring lectures and easy As via practice quizzes
  • Recent and online reviews slam heavy busywork, late materials, and
  • and organization is a

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Many students report easy As if and study guides, though papers and busywork can still ding grades.

; in-person reviews more often call it an easy A with study guides.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is readable with study guides, but dense political theory and .

Online sections feel harder due to self-teaching and volume of work; in-person lectures help more.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skipping hurts participation and pass rates.

Evidence is mostly from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About six in , but praise for passion is offset by organization and workload complaints.

; recent online reviews are far more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call her an easy grader with ; and discussions.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize harsh paper deductions; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Frequent chapter outlines, discussion questions, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe full-time-job workloads; but more lecture-supported.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Passionate, knowledgeable lectures when present, but lateness, disorganization, and weak online teaching pull the score down.

Format shift

In-person lectures get strong praise; online delivery is often described as self-taught.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and occasional .

Format shift

Both formats use exams and papers; online adds more discussion-post volume.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many call her passionate with amazing lectures and easy As if you use study guides, while , and .

Main concern

, and mandatory attendance frustrate students who need structure.

What students said

“By far my fav professor!!”
POLI25
“If .”
POLI25
“Easy, easy A.”
POLI25

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel self-taught with , and .

Main concern

Unreasonable workload, late uploads, and .

What students said

“She assigned so and a full time job.”
POLI1
“Teacher is unreasonable, not true to due dates, unprofessional and has a temper.”
POL110
“She's a but expects a lot from you.”
POLI1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often multiple choice and closely match study guides or .

Study guides match examsMultiple choiceIn-person examsPractice quizzesOccasional take-home

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams often mirror study guides; one student notes .

Study guides match examsMultiple choiceNo take-home examsResearch paper
“ !!!!!”
POLI25
“ .”
POLI25
“The same as the exam.”
POLI103

Online

Limited online exam detail; and .

Heavy homeworkTough paper grading
“I got a 70% on the research paper, worth 10%of your grade, because it wasn't in MLA format even though my analysis was perfect.”
POLI1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“In all honesty, she did look like a hard professor-like you really gotta know your stuff type of professor. But when you actually have a conversation with her, you can tell she cares.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews (3 online, 46 in person), highlighting passion, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Passion

58/100

“She's like a walking encyclopedia of politics.”

📚 Workload Intensity

32/100

“She assigned so and a full time job.”

📈 Grade Path

72/100

“Just do the study guides and you'll pass with an easy A.”

👎 Organization Risk

40/100

“She was always late to class, assigns a lot of busy work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are impacted but are amazing so try to soak it all in.
  • She is so passionate and knows so much about politics you cant help but be interested!
  • Shes an awful professor. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy, easy A.
  • .
  • EASY just do her study guides

Theme 3

⏰

  • Do not take her at 8 a.m because she was late ALL the time.
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • the transition to online was a nightmare she just uploads a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

49 reviews spanning 2013-2025 with detailed comments and consistent theme clusters raise credibility despite format skew.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 510
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

POLI2528 reviews
POLI112 reviews
POL1103 reviews
POLI1033 reviews
POLI92 reviews
Show 1 more courses
POL91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 4 · A 17 · A- 2

B range

13

B+ 4 · B 9

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1